Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haskins v. Clary, 346 So. 2d 193.
- Cupp v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Co. 459 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
Jenkins v. Ouachita Parish School Bd.
459 So. 2d 143
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
which summarizes the rules applicable to the exception as follows: The peremptory exception of no cause of action tests the legal sufficiency of the petition, and is triable on the face of the papers.
-
Teachers'retirement System v. La. St. Employees Retirement System
456 So. 2d 594
La. 1984
Hero Land Co. v. Texaco, Inc., at 96 (La.1975); Budget Plan of Baton Rouge
- Owens v. Martin 449 So. 2d 448 La. 1984
- Darville v. Texaco, Inc. 447 So. 2d 473 La. 1984
-
Didier v. Department of State Civil Service
446 So. 2d 886
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
- Fabre v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp. 446 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-
Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
444 So. 2d 618
La. 1984
art. 927; Elliott v. Dupuy 242 La.
-
Berry v. Bank of Louisiana
439 So. 2d 1166
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The Louisiana Supreme Court, at 194-195 (La., 1977) discussed the factors to be considered in disposing of an exception of no cause of action: The peremptory exception of no cause of action tests the legal sufficiency of the petition, and is triable on the face of the papers.
- Lindley v. Cardwell 430 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
Smith on Behalf of Smith v. City of Kenner
428 So. 2d 1171
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
at 194, as follows: "The peremptory exception of no cause of action tests the legal sufficiency of the petition, and is triable on the face of the papers.
- Slocum v. Daigre 424 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Ober v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Corrections 424 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Williamson-Dickie Apparel Manufacturing Co. v. Hanger, Inc.
422 So. 2d 602
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
- Ailstock v. Hamiter 420 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
-
Katz v. Katz
412 So. 2d 1291
La. 1982
Eschete v. City of New Orleans, 258 La.
- Hurst v. Massey 411 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Moss v. Guarisco 409 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Tompkins v. Kenner Police Dept.
402 So. 2d 276
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
NOTES [1] Haskins v. Clary, La., ; Pence v. Ketchum, La., ; Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., La., .
-
Taft v. City of Bossier City
401 So. 2d 461
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
and cases cited therein.
-
Monies Lumber Co. v. Village Du Lac, Inc.
399 So. 2d 747
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
- Dillard v. Stamm 400 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Alessi v. Allstate Ins. Co.
400 So. 2d 1089
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the court said: "The general rule applicable to trial of such exceptions is that an exception of no cause of action must be overruled unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based; that is, unless plaintiff has no cause of a
- Pellerin v. Cashway Pharmacy of Franklin, Inc. 396 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Thibodeaux v. Jones & Lockhart, Inc.
393 So. 2d 291
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the court said: “The general rule applicable to trial of such exceptions is that an exception of no cause of action must be overruled unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based; that is, unless plaintiff has no *293 cause
- Jim McCary, Inc. v. Price 391 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
-
Elliott v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.
387 So. 2d 1383
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
and Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
- Fuller v. Scott 387 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Hall v. City of New Orleans 385 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Jarvis v. Lafayette General Hospital 379 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Ely v. Northumberland General Insurance 378 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- Succession of Vidrine 377 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
-
Brunet v. Evangeline Parish Board of Supervisors of Elections
376 So. 2d 633
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
-
Brunet v. EVANGELINE PARISH BD., ETC.
376 So. 2d 633
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.
- Jarvis v. Lafayette General Hospital 378 So. 2d 430 La. 1979
- Wilson v. Cost+ Plus of Vivian, Inc. 375 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
- Kane v. Braquet 368 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
- Whatley v. State 369 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- Roberts v. Roberts 368 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
-
Peloquin v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury
367 So. 2d 1246
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Hero Lands v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
- Crier v. City of New Orleans 365 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
-
Overruled
Jones v. Sights & Sounds, Inc.
365 So. 2d 15
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
” *17 Accordingly the judgment appealed from is reversed, defendant’s exception of no cause of action is overruled, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
- Ranger v. Jean Fore Mortgage Co. 364 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
-
Walker v. Western-Southern Life Ins. Co.
361 So. 2d 892
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
and cases cited therein.
- Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 363 So. 2d 711 La. 1978
- Overruled Walters v. Sentry Insurance 354 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Pettus v. Atchafalaya Wildlife Protective Soc. 351 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977