Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 347 So. 2d 184.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
First, we acknowledge that “[w]hen an indictment is amended, unless a defendant moves for a continuance on the ground that he is prejudiced thereby and requires additional time to prepare his defense, he cannot later contend that he was prejudiced by the amendment.” see also State v. Lafleur, 13-1082 (La.App.
State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
First, we acknowledge that “[w]hen an indictment is amended, unless a defendant moves for a continuance on the ground that he is prejudiced thereby and requires additional time to prepare his defense, he cannot later contend that he was prejudiced by the amendment.” see also State v. Lafleur, 13-1082 (La.App.
State v. Ferguson 181 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
State v. Austin 900 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Henderson 721 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Coleman 702 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Sumlin 617 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
the wife of a confidential informant was present and the court did not require the disclosure of her identity.
State v. Thomas 553 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Roviaro v. United States, supra
State v. Clark 553 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Saddler 538 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
495 , 78 L.Ed.2d 688 (1983)
State v. Issac 527 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Irvine 515 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. O'NEAL 501 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Troquille 493 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
471 , (1971)] State v. Santos, [ ] and State v. Williams, [ ] supra.
State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. McGee 478 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Bailey 452 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); "
State v. Booth 448 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Frith 436 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
which held that: "When an indictment is amended, unless a defendant moves for a continuance on the ground that he is prejudiced thereby and requires additional time to prepare his defense, he cannot later contend that he was prejudiced by the amendment."
State v. Zamora 430 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957)
State v. Davis 411 So. 2d 434 La. 1982
an informant and his wife accompanied a New Orleans narcotics agent to a local bar, where the informant introduced the defendant to the agent.
State v. James 396 So. 2d 1281 La. 1981
623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); State v. Dotson, 260 La.
State v. Gibson 391 So. 2d 421 La. 1980
State v. Williams 392 So. 2d 619 La. 1980
State v. Babbitt 363 So. 2d 690 La. 1978
State v. Weems 358 So. 2d 285 La. 1978
State v. Williams, La., (1977); State v. de la Beckwith, La., (1977); State v. Robinson, La., (1977); State v. Russell, La., (1976).