Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Schwander, 345 So. 2d 1173.
- State of Louisiana v. Deon Ray Bartie La. 2025
- State Of Louisiana v. Travis Haxford Orso La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State Of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr. La. 2023
-
State of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
“A trial jury’s inference that an accused aided and abetted in a crime cannot be ‘mere speculation based upon guilt by association.’” ().
- State Of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Trahan A/k/a Elizebeth Trahan La. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Leo Dorsey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- State Of Louisiana v. James Bourgeois La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Brent M. Braneon Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. David Leger La. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Khoi Q. Hoang La. 2019
-
State v. Williams
266 So. 3d 485
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999) ; State v. Schwander , (La.
- State v. Leonard 262 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
State of Louisiana v. Darryl Jones
La. 2018
1992) (per curiam) (When the state’s evidence merely invites the jury to speculate on a number of reasonable probabilities, some consistent with guilt, others consistent of innocence, a reasonable jury must entertain a reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt.); (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Debbie E. Adams AKA Debbie Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- State v. Bernard 171 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
-
State v. Jones
166 So. 3d 406
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999)
-
State v. Brooks
139 So. 3d 1072
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 390 (1999)
- State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- State v. Trahan 61 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
at 1374 (La.1978); at 1175 (La.1977); at 833 (La.1976).
-
State v. Hunter
41 So. 3d 546
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
at 1374 (La.1978); at 1175 (La.1977); at 833 (La.1976).
- State v. QUAC TRAN 18 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. Butler
997 So. 2d 631
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Pierre , 93-893 at 4, 631 So.2d at 428
- State v. Stewart 982 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Thompson
894 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court, stated: A person may be convicted of an offense even if he has not personally fired the fatal shot.
-
State v. Garrick
870 So. 2d 990
La. 2004
14:24, mere presence at the scene of the crime, and mere knowledge that a crime is about to occur, does not mean that an individual is "concerned" in, or aided or abetted, the commission of an offense
- State v. Gilliam 827 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
-
State v. Stewart
815 So. 2d 14
La. 2002
Mere presence at the scene is therefore not enough to `concern' an individual in the crime.")().
- State v. Johnson 803 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Neal 796 So. 2d 649 La. 2001
- State v. Arnold 801 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
-
State v. Furgerson
781 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Jasper, 28,187 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96) .
- State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
- State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
-
State v. Douglas
707 So. 2d 512
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
at 1374 (La.1978); at 1175 (La.1977); at 833 (La.
-
State v. Vale
699 So. 2d 876
La. 1997
("[a] trial jury's inference that an accused aided and abetted in a crime cannot be `mere speculation based upon guilt by association.'
-
State v. Bowman
677 So. 2d 1094
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
The Supreme Court also noted that "[m]ere presence at the scene is not enough to `concern' an individual in the crime,"
- State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Wiley 672 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
State v. Girod
653 So. 2d 664
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
A jury's finding that a defendant aided and abetted in the commission of the crime "cannot be `mere speculation based upon guilt by association.'" [].
- State v. Long 643 So. 2d 132 La. 1994
- State v. Pierre 631 So. 2d 427 La. 1994