Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Miller v. Keating, 349 So. 2d 265.

83 citing documents.

Cynthia Walker v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Safety National Casualty Corporation, and Joseph Rashaun Wimberly La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Curole v. Delcambre 224 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1976), writ granted, affirmed and amended, noted: If a conspiracy is conceived and executed and a private injury results, the person injured has a cause of action against all of the conspirators.
Robinson v. Ky Quang Nguyen 201 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Garcia v. Lewis 197 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Stacy v. Minit Oil Change, supra.
Derek Lemaire v. David Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Restatement (2d) of Agency § 236; cf. 1 W. Malone & A. Johnson, supra, § 161, at 309.
Lemaire v. Richard 125 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Restatement (2d) of Agency § 236; cf. 1 W. Malone & A. Johnson, supra, § 161, at 309.
Nakia Edmond v. Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Edmond v. PATHFINDER ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 73 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Macaluso v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. 59 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
MacAluso v. TRAVELERS CAS. AND SUR. CO. 59 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Booth v. Orleans Parish School Board 49 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Johnson v. Littleton 37 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Truell Holloway v. City of Oberlin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Holloway v. City of Oberlin 21 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc. 14 So. 3d LV La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3rd Cir.1976), writ granted, affirmed and amended, (La.App.
Cheramie Services v. Shell Deepwater Prod. 14 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
3rd Cir.1976), writ granted, affirmed and amended, (La.App.
State v. Vallot 970 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Raphael Vallot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Latiolais v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INS. CO. 949 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hilda Latiolais v. State Farm Mutual Auto ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Christopher Armand v. Jeffrey F. Lachney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Armand v. Lachney 921 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Garcia v. Furnace and Tube Service, Inc. 921 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Stacy v. Minit Oil Change, Inc., supra .
Patrick v. Poisso 882 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Stacy v. Minit Oil Change, Inc., supra .
Bates v. Caruso 881 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Stacy v. Minit Oil Change, Inc. 874 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Bridges v. X Communications, Inc. 861 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Swartz v. McNabb 830 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Guy v. Mitchell 810 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
With regard to this factor, (La.
Craft v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 799 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Griffin v. Kmart Corp. 776 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Eichelberger v. Sidney 771 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
art. 2320; Baumeister v. Plunkett, 95-2270 (La.5/21/96)
Affeltranger-Cheramie v. Zachary 757 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Rambo v. Webster Parish School Bd. 745 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
As noted by the court in Baumeister, supra, this does not mean that all four of these factors must be present before liability may be found.
Tanner v. Reynolds Metals Co. 739 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Wright v. Skate Country, Inc. 734 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Taylor v. Shoney's, Inc. 726 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Hanson v. Benelli 719 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Harrington v. La. State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Educ. 714 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Nelson v. Williams 707 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Stephens v. Bail Enforcement of Louisiana 690 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3rd Cir.1976), amended on other grounds, the court stated: The words "assists" and "encourages," as used in Article 2324 of the Civil Code, contemplate acts performed pursuant to a conspiracy which cause injury or damage.
Varnado v. Department of Employment and Training 687 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Michelet v. Scheuring SEC. Services Inc. 680 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Ermert, 559 So.2d at 477
Baumeister v. Plunkett 673 So. 2d 994 La. 1996
Patterson v. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc. 667 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Synthesizing the analysis of Miller v. Keating [ ] and Austen v. Sherwood, supra, [ ], the court concluded that because vicarious liability is based on the attribution of business-related risks to the enterprise, specific conduct may be considered within the course and scope of employment even though it is done in part to serve the pu
Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace 661 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
3rd Cir.1976), amended on other grounds and aff'd, Buras v. Machella, 172 La.
Latullas v. State 658 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Later, the court stated that it did not mean to suggest that all four of the factors set forth in LeBrane must be met before vicarious liability may be found.
Benoit v. Roche 657 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
(reversing our decision at (La.App.
Massey v. Decca Drilling Co., Inc. 647 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
the Supreme Court explained that it had not intended to suggest that, in all cases of an employer's vicarious liability for the intentional torts of his employee, all four of these factors must be met before liability may be found.
Strahan v. STATE, THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 645 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3rd Cir. 1976), writ granted, affirmed and amended, (La.