Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sheppard, 350 So. 2d 615.

151 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Marvin Santiago La. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Terrence Armstrong A/K/A Terrance Armstrong A/K/A Dugga La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Michael Edwin Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jewel Demon Humphrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Cody Nicholas Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Stacy Tyrone Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
State v. Ross 144 So. 3d 932 La. 2014
We reject the defendant’s contention that the following cases provide authority for his position that disclosure of grand jury materials for the purpose of obtaining a prior inconsistent statement of, and/or the cross-examination of, a witness is a violation of this state’s secrecy laws: State v. O’Blanc
State of Louisiana v. Freddie L. Burton, Jr. AKA Freddie L. Burton, AKA Freddie L. Burton, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Burton 64 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
I did it for you to feel comfortable to know there’s no doubt, a hundred percent, according to both detectives, according to both of them a hundred percent this man’s prints are on the box[.j Additionally
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Demond Pitree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Pitree 930 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3593 (1984); State v. O’Blanc, State v. Terrebonne, 256 La.
State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3593 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984); State v. Terrebonne, 256 La.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
1558 , 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989) (); ); see also, State v. Smith, 95-1826 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Levi Joseph Garrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 1984), writ denied
State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
App. 1 Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Peterson 868 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1826, 1830-31 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966)
State of Louisiana v. James R. Skipper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Williams, 258 La.
State v. Skipper 861 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Williams, 258 La.
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
State v. Jones 794 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
2nd Cir.10/30/96), writ denied, 96-2880 (La.4/25/97), ; State v. Parker, supra , (La.
State v. Williams 769 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Day 762 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 227 (1996); *271 (La.
State v. Carter 762 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Arnold, supra; cert.
State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 227 (1996); (La.
State v. Blanchard 749 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 227 (1996)
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
1982)); see also State v. Smith, 95-1826, p. 20 (La.App.
State v. Duhe 733 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Arcuri 729 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In all cases, the burden of proof “rests on defendant to establish purposeful discrimination in the selection of grand and petit jury venires.” State v. Ashworth, 97-2917, p. 1 (La.11/25/97), ().
State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
State v. Ashworth 704 So. 2d 228 La. 1997
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Hampton 687 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the Supreme Court upheld a general venire composed of a list of registered voters and persons with driver’s licenses residing in the parish, where there was no showing that such a selection process was discriminatory.
State v. Strickland 683 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 227 (U.S., 10/15/96), (interior citations omitted).
State v. Timon 683 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
As the Court stated in another first degree murder case, "[w]e are unwilling to say that the cumulative effect of assignments of error lacking in merit warrants reversal of a conviction [or sentence]."
State v. Evans 669 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
State v. Grubbs 644 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Barker 628 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Davis 626 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
1977) (motion to recuse properly denied and district attorney's actions described as "routine" where district attorney took stand at suppression hearing to refute allegations of promises of leniency and took stand at trial to lay foundation for admission of confession); (motion to recuse district attorney properly denied and actions described as "consistent with his function as the prosecutorial force" where district attorney interviewed defendant immediately after arrest and held a press confer