DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Doucet, 359 So. 2d 1239.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Cassetti Dewayne Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    Mr. Brown, however, contends the motion to suppress should have been heard, for the premise that a claim by a defendant that his constitutional rights have been violated should be tried even during trial, “unless it can be shown that defendant’s failure to file a pretrial motion was a deliberate strategic bypass of the State procedure.” Despite the language o
  • State v. Brumfield 104 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    In Louisiana, the application of the doctrine has been limited 'to those cases where it is required by Ashe v. Swenson "
  • State v. Wilder 983 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    as support for the proposition that police are not entitled to search his vehicle without a warrant when he has been removed from the vehicle.
  • State v. Cotton 778 So. 2d 569 La. 2001
    In Louisiana, the application of the doctrine has been limited `to those cases where it is required by Ashe v. Swenson ...'" (La.
  • State v. Daniels 614 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Magee 552 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Blache 480 So. 2d 304 La. 1985
  • State v. Harrison 471 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Kimbrough 432 So. 2d 833 La. 1983
  • State v. Littleton 436 So. 2d 500 La. 1983
    we held that "the application of collateral estoppel in this State is limited to those cases where it is required by Ashe v. Swenson, supra."
  • State v. Hernandez 410 So. 2d 1381 La. 1982
    State v. Williams, *1386
  • State v. Knowles 392 So. 2d 651 La. 1980
  • State v. Pomes 376 So. 2d 133 La. 1979
  • State v. Doucet 371 So. 2d 739 La. 1979
    Furthermore, (on rehearing) a motion to suppress on constitutional grounds should be entertained during trial “unless it can be shown that defendant’s failure to file a pre-trial motion was a deliberate strategic bypass of the State procedure.” In that case, involving this same defendant, but a different prosecution (cas
  • State v. LaRue 368 So. 2d 1048 La. 1979