DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guillot, 353 So. 2d 1005.

91 citing documents.

  • State v. Doucette 243 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    quoting State v. Guillot , , 1008-09 (La.
  • State v. Broome 136 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    289 , 70 L.Ed.2d 139 (1981); writ denied, State v. Warner, 93-0216 (La.App.4th Cir.7/27/94), , writ denied, 94-2517 (La.1/27/95), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Brent Authorlee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Authorlee 111 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Blackson 108 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lee Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    at 114; State v. Guillot, [ (La.1977)].
  • State v. Guillory 61 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    at 2253 ; State v. Guillot, [ , (La.1977)].
  • State v. Kimble 62 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Fred Ballard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Johnson v. Department of Police 2 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Thomas 951 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Kemp 896 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Bartley 871 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Lee 868 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    2243, 2253 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); State v. Guillot, supra ( ).
  • State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
  • State v. Lagrange 702 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    this court indicated that it would employ the five factors articulated in Manson v. Brathwaite, supra, to balance the corrupting effect of a suggestive identification.
  • State v. Guy 669 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Manson, supra ; -09 (La.1977), writ denied
  • State v. Rosette 653 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Duncan 635 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Wilson 632 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Dyer 621 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Manson, supra ; writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Hensley 608 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. James 592 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); (La.App.
  • State v. Tucker 591 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Manson, supra; writ denied, (La.
  • State v. McCarter 577 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Hawkins 572 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. George 570 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    This determination is made by examining articulable features of the pictures used: height, weight, build, hair color, length, and texture, facial hair, skin color and complexion, and the shape of the nose, eyes, lips
  • State v. Bartley 564 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Swayze 554 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Fontenot 550 So. 2d 179 La. 1989
    1007 n. 1 (La.1977); , 204 n. 2 (La.1975); Gulf Utilities Co. v. Dixie Elec.
  • State v. Isaac 542 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    This determination is made by examining articulable features of the pictures such as height; weight; build; hair color, length and texture; facial hair; skin color and complexion; and the shape and size of the nose, eyes, lips, State v. Medford, supra.
  • State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    This determination is made by examining articulable features of the pictures such as height; weight; build; hair color, length and texture; facial hair; skin color and complexion; and the shape and size of the nose, eyes, lips, State v. Medford, supra.
  • State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mims 501 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Savoy 501 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    -1009 (La.1977), quoting from Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct.
  • State v. Burge 498 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Robins 499 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lewis 489 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Medford 489 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Standley 485 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Picot 482 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    See Manson v. Brathwaite, supra; also, (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 481 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lewis 478 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Ruffin 475 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
  • State v. Sepcich 473 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. McNeal 471 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 471 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Austin 470 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985