Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dominick, 354 So. 2d 1316.

39 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jamaria Xavier Randle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    Id.; State v. 38 Dominick
  • State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See State v. Ortiz, 96-1609 at 14, 701 So.2d at 931 ().
  • State v. Marshall 6 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Durden, supra; State v. Allen, supra
  • State v. White 968 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Durden, supra ; Allen, supra, citing
  • State v. McFarland 960 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Scroggins 926 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Durden 842 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Allen 828 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Tolliver 818 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Roddy 756 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Hebert, 29,062 (La.App.
  • State v. Cayton 721 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
  • State v. McCartney 684 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Peters 553 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
    1979); State v. Garon, 161 La.
  • State v. Dominick 545 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Gilmore 529 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    the acting foreman signed the bill of indictment because the foreman was not present.
  • State v. Wells 522 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Joseph 463 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    holds that where the defendant was charged as a principle on the theory of aiding and abetting, he need not have personally held a weapon to be guilty of armed robbery.
  • State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
    3571 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1411 (1983)
  • State v. Lawry 430 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Shea 421 So. 2d 200 La. 1982
    Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ ] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct.
  • State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
    State v. Williams, supra
  • State v. Willie 410 So. 2d 1019 La. 1982
  • State v. Davis 407 So. 2d 666 La. 1981
    Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted [ ], once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.
  • State v. Morris 397 So. 2d 1237 La. 1981
  • State v. Monroe 397 So. 2d 1258 La. 1981
    (on original hearing); -22 (La.
  • State v. Thucos 390 So. 2d 1281 La. 1980
    Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ ] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.
  • State v. Manning 380 So. 2d 46 La. 1980
  • State v. Mouton 366 So. 2d 1336 La. 1978
  • State v. Hayes 364 So. 2d 923 La. 1978
  • State v. Boen 362 So. 2d 519 La. 1978