Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dominick, 354 So. 2d 1316.
- State of Louisiana v. Jamaria Xavier Randle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
-
State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Id.; State v. 38 Dominick
- State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
-
State v. Jacobs
67 So. 3d 535
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Ortiz, 96-1609 at 14, 701 So.2d at 931 ().
-
State v. Marshall
6 So. 3d 1051
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Durden, supra; State v. Allen, supra
-
State v. White
968 So. 2d 901
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Durden, supra ; Allen, supra, citing
- State v. McFarland 960 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
- State v. Scroggins 926 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- State v. Durden 842 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Allen 828 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Tolliver 818 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
-
State v. Roddy
756 So. 2d 1272
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hebert, 29,062 (La.App.
- State v. Cayton 721 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
- State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
- State v. McCartney 684 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- State v. Peters 553 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Deboue
552 So. 2d 355
La. 1989
1979); State v. Garon, 161 La.
- State v. Dominick 545 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Gilmore
529 So. 2d 859
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the acting foreman signed the bill of indictment because the foreman was not present.
- State v. Wells 522 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Joseph
463 So. 2d 1014
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
holds that where the defendant was charged as a principle on the theory of aiding and abetting, he need not have personally held a weapon to be guilty of armed robbery.
- State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Jackson
450 So. 2d 621
La. 1984
3571 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1411 (1983)
- State v. Lawry 430 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Shea
421 So. 2d 200
La. 1982
Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ ] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the `scrupulous honoring' of that right by the police, Michigan v. Mosely, 423 U.S. 96 , 96 S.Ct.
-
State v. Vaccaro
411 So. 2d 415
La. 1982
State v. Williams, supra
- State v. Willie 410 So. 2d 1019 La. 1982
-
State v. Davis
407 So. 2d 666
La. 1981
Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted [ ], once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.
- State v. Morris 397 So. 2d 1237 La. 1981
-
State v. Monroe
397 So. 2d 1258
La. 1981
(on original hearing); -22 (La.
-
State v. Thucos
390 So. 2d 1281
La. 1980
Although it has been recognized that an accused may later change his mind and waive the same rights which he earlier asserted, [ ] once a defendant has invoked his constitutional right to remain silent or his right to counsel, the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon the "scrupulous honoring" of that right by the police.
- State v. Manning 380 So. 2d 46 La. 1980
- State v. Mouton 366 So. 2d 1336 La. 1978
- State v. Hayes 364 So. 2d 923 La. 1978
- State v. Boen 362 So. 2d 519 La. 1978