Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 363 So. 2d 639.

55 citing documents.

State ex rel. Smith v. State 188 So. 3d 1042 La. 2016
The entrapment defense is designed to deter the police from planting criminal ideas in innocent minds and thereby promoting crimes which would not otherwise have been committed, R. Perkins, Criminal l,aw, Ch, 10, § 9 (1969), The entrapment defense has two elements; (l) on inducement by a state agent to comm
State v. Jones 99 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Shedrick Dewayne Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste, supra [ ].” In Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540, 112 S.Ct.
State v. NIONS 952 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Taylor 888 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Iron 780 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Batiste, supra [ ]."
State v. Bradford 745 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Smith 734 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hardy 715 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Kerrigan 671 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Sumlin 617 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Colbert 615 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3d Cir.1986), sentence modified, La.
State v. Chatman 599 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Tate 593 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. St. Amant 584 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Martin 582 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Chiles 569 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Entrapment, as a defense, : “Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law •enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherwise induces another person to engage in conduct
State v. Brown 551 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Skaggs 551 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Kotwitz 549 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Thomas 546 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Jackson 545 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Simon 544 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
4th Cir.1986) require that a mistrial be granted.
State v. Antoine 539 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Prudhomme 532 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Deville 524 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Mims 524 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
The defendant's requested jury instruction, is as follows: Under the generally accepted view, an entrapment is perpetuated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages or otherwise induces another person to engage in
State v. Bryant 521 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Brand 520 So. 2d 114 La. 1988
W. LaFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law § 48 (1972)
State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Thibodeaux 509 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Brand 506 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Comeaux 505 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Marks 503 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
: Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherwise induces another person to engage in conduct consti
State v. Farmer 497 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the Supreme Court enunciated that: “Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherwise induces anothe
State v. Troquille 493 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Augustus 479 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
: Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining évidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherwise induces another person to engage in conduct c
State v. Lewis 478 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Thibodeaux 473 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 471 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Roberts 471 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Guarisco 466 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 464 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Picchini 463 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Cook 460 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Maumus v. Dept. of Police, New Orleans 457 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Dunn 452 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
The law on entrapment as a : *306 “Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherwise induces another person to engage in conduct
State v. Bernard 441 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Richards 426 So. 2d 1314 La. 1982
The law on entrapment as a at pages 641-42 of the Southern Reporter as follows: " Under the generally accepted view an entrapment is perpetrated when a law enforcement official or a person acting in cooperation with such an official, for the purpose of obtaining evidence of the commission of an offense, solicits, encourages, or otherw