Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 360 So. 2d 1331.

180 citing documents.

Werner v. Department of Police 487 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Keys v. Mercy Hosp. of New Orleans 485 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Simar v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. 483 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1 Cir.1978), writ refused, the court cited Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and stated that: “a medical specialist is required by La.
Peppard v. Hilton Hotels Corp. 482 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Griffin v. SUCCESSION OF BRANCH EX REL. SMITH 480 So. 2d 313 La. 1986
Co., cf., Comment, Prescription and Peremption The 1982 Revision of the Louisiana Civil Code, 58 Tul.L.Rev.
Bailey v. Douglas 478 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Goldking Properties Co. v. Primeaux 478 So. 2d 1207 La. 1985
(citing Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., ): In a civilian jurisdiction such as ours, in which courts are bound to follow the positive law, case law should not supplant legislative or constitutional authority.
Ayo v. Control Insulation Corp. 477 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University 477 So. 2d 1094 La. 1985
Culver v. Ochsner Foundation Hosp. 474 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Burgess v. City of Shreveport 471 So. 2d 690 La. 1985
App.3d Cir.1977), reversed on other grounds
Cahn v. Cahn 468 So. 2d 1176 La. 1985
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Spragio v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EMP. GROUP BENEFITS PROGRAM 468 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Banda v. Danburg 469 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Co., as follows: [A] medical specialist is required by La.
Matthews v. La. State Univ. Medical Center 467 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Tullier v. Tullier 464 So. 2d 278 La. 1985
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Rico v. Vangundy 461 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.App.
Matranga v. Sara Mayo Hosp. 463 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, LSA-R.S.
COMMERCIAL CREDIT CLAIMS SER., INC. v. Richardson 454 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Co., rehearing denied 1978.
Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 444 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Associated Executive Control, Inc. v. Bankers Union Life Insurance Co. 438 So. 2d 205 La. 1983
4 Hymel v. Central Farms & Shipping Co., 183 La.
State v. Bolden 437 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Gendusa v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 435 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Lasseigne v. Dauterive 433 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (La.
Paul v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
9:2794; Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
Powell v. Ferguson 429 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Forstall v. Hotel Dieu Hosp. 429 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard of care to which a specialist is held in Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., : "[A] medical specialist is required by La.
Steinbach v. Barfield 428 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Jackson v. State 428 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court held that the statute should be applied retroactively.
Trichel v. Caire 427 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
9:2794, supra, and Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
Procell v. Insurance Co. of North America 425 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1979); Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Wood v. Wood 424 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(emphasis supplied by this court) to the effect that case law is invaluable in interpreting the Civil Code, but is not the primary source of the law of Louisiana, which rests upon the written expressions of the legislature and other legislative and administrative bodies.
Breazeale v. CNA Insurance 417 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In certain limited cases, statutes are accorded retroactive effect in this state: 1.
Moran v. Dean 416 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Daniel v. ST. FRANCIS CABRINI HOSP. ETC. 415 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
[2] Under the reasoning of Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., we have serious doubts as to whether any "locality rule" is applicable to registered nurses.
Batiste v. Security Ins. Group 416 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
Dominguez v. Travelers & Allstate Insurance 415 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Terrebonne v. SOUTH LOUISIANA TIDAL WATER CONTROL LEVEE DIST. 414 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
held that the general principle of non-retroactivity as stated by La.C.C.
Nelson v. Continental Cas. Co. 412 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Moss v. Guarisco 409 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Co., I would look to the Civil Code as the primary source, recognize that Kline v. Eubanks incorrectly relied on other state sources, later abrogated by those states and that stare decisis "should not be thought controlling in this state" and make the holding that the majority so obviously hopes the Supreme Cour
Lombard v. Manchester Life Ins. Co. 406 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
AF Blair Co., Inc. v. Mason 406 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The rule has been abrogated in the case of some doctors, (La.
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins. Co. 403 So. 2d 26 La. 1981
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Garlington v. Kingsley, supra .
Ewing v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 402 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Lott v. Haley, supra; Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Orleans Parish School Board v. Pittman Construction Co., 261 La.
Mason v. Mason 399 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Baynard v. GUARDIAN LIFE INS. CO., ETC. 399 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ray v. Ameri-Care Hospital 400 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The defendants have attempted to sustain their burden by offering proof that in the case of the specialist he has measured *1134 up to the standard of care as announced by our Supreme Court in Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and that in the case of the hospital it has measured up to the jurisprudential standard of care set out in Bryant v. St.
Brocato v. Leggio 393 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Tilley v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
Moore v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 395 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981