DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 360 So. 2d 1331.

180 citing documents.

  • Vincent v. Romagosa 390 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Our construction of the statute is supported by Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (La.
  • Clegg Concrete, Inc. v. Kel-Bar, Inc. 393 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Co., that legislation is a primary source and cases a secondary source of law, I would hold that the lien affidavit would have to be filed “within 60 days after the date of the last delivery of all material upon the said property ...
  • Johnson v. Fournet 387 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. [Anzelmo], 222 La.
  • Stipe v. Joseph A. Neyrey General Contractors, Inc. 385 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Co., the Supreme Court, in deciding that a statute which did not adopt a standard tied to locality for medical specialists should be given a retrospective effect and thus should be applied to facts arising prior to its promulgation, said at pages 1338-1339: “The general principle of non-retroac-tivity of laws is
  • Babin v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 385 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Bryant v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 382 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    As such, Dr. Rhoades was subject to the higher standard of care as announced by our Supreme Court in Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (1978) and as provided by LSA-R.S.
  • Bordelon v. Bordelon 381 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    See Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, where a medical malpractice statute was held retroactive both because it was interpretive legislation and because it was procedural.
  • Wheeler v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY, ETC. 377 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Heymann v. Lewis 414 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Co., (which states that the courts must look less to the jurisprudence and more to the legislative will), entered an order changing custody from the mother to the father, reserving "broad visitation rights" to the mother.
  • Villetto v. Weilbaecher 377 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Devillier v. Devillier 371 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    and especially the authorities listed in footnotes 5 and 6 on page 1334.
  • Harris v. State, Through Huey P. Long Hospital 371 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Berry v. Berry 371 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Finally, our Supreme Court, in Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, emphasized that in deciding issues we must refer "first to the code and other legislative sources" rather than treating judicial opinions as the primary source of law.
  • Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. v. Pittman Const. Co., Inc. 372 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Steele v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 371 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Lott v. Haley 370 So. 2d 521 La. 1979
    Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.
  • Bryant v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 365 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    The trial court did not have the benefit of Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (La.
  • Devore v. Hobart Mfg. Co. 367 So. 2d 836 La. 1979
    Co., we recently discussed the basis of delictual liability in Louisiana.
  • Lambert v. Michel 364 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Overruled Holloway v. Southern Baptist Hospital 367 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Hankel v. Hartford Fire Insurance 366 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    The decision of this court in Hankel v. Hartford, No. 12,016, June 12, 1978 (an unpublished opinion) was remanded to us by the Louisiana Supreme Court on October 20, 1978, No. 63,101, for reconsideration in light of Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  • Brown v. Allen Sanitarium, Inc. 364 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • Daniels v. Albach Co., Inc. 365 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Carter v. Phillips 365 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Hankel v. Hartford Fire Insurance 363 So. 2d 1188 La. 1978
    Co., without limitation on the Court of Appeal’s consideration of any other issues advanced at the reargument.
  • White v. Edison 361 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • McKenzie v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. 363 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    1977), partially reversed on grounds not related to quantum
  • Reynolds v. Phillips 363 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    9:2794, as well as the recent application of that statute by the Supreme Court in Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
  • Guilyot v. Del-Gulf Supply, Inc. 362 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Hines v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 361 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in the very recent case of Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company et al., was faced with the question of whether the “locality rule” applies to malpractice actions against medical specialists.