Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 359 So. 2d 154.

125 citing documents.

Cameron Soule v. Woodward Design + Build, LLC, Houston Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
“Identity of parties can also be satisfied when a privy of one of the parties is involved.” Burguieres, 2002-1385, p. 8, n.3, 843 So.2d at 1054 ( (La.
Joshua B. Archote v. William F. Tate IV, in his official capacity as president and custodian of records … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Capitol One, N.A., 2011 WL 5420374, *3( (La.
Thomas Nieto v. Jennifer Dodd and Main Squeeze Juice Holdings, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
“A person has the same ‘quality’ when he or she appears in the same capacity in both suits or when he or she is privy to a party in the prior suit.” TMF Hotel Properties, L.L.C., 2018-0079, p. 11, 318 So.3d at 764 (citation omitted); (La.
Randall Kling v. Troy Hebert Ernest P. Legier, Jr., in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of the … La. 2024
Succession of Carle Laine Carpenter La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
“There exists an identity of parties whenever the same parties, their successors, or others appear so long as they share the same ‘quality’ as parties.” (La.
Carlo Carollo, Jr., and Frank Carollo, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Carlo Carollo, Sr. and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Global Marketing Solutions, L.L.C. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation, Key Production Company, Inc., Seal Energy Company, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Wicker v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 257 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Quatrevingt v. State 242 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1980) ; Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation , (La.
Explained Newman, Hoffoss & Devall, LLP v. Raleigh Newman, Aplc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12 we explained that “[t]here exists an identity of parties whenever the same parties, their successors, or others appear so long as they share the same ‘quality’ as parties.” In Hudson v. City of Bossier, 33,620 at p. 8 (La.App.
Explained Newman Hoffoss & Devall, LLP v. Raleigh Newman, APLC 216 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
we explained that “[tjhere exists an identity of parties whenever the same parties, their successors, or others appear so long as they share the same ‘quality’ as parties.” In Hudson v. City of Bossier, 33,620 at p. 8 (La.App.
Robbins v. Delta Wire Rope, Inc. 196 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Mandalay Oil & Gas, L.L.C. v. Energy Development Corp., 2001-0993, pp. 16-17 (La.App.
Meadows v. Winkler 154 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Furie Petroleum Co. v. SWEPI, LP 152 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
citing Quinette v. Delhommer, 247 La.
Eddy Oliver, Oscarlene Nixon, and Mildred Goodwin v. Orleans Parish School Board 156 So. 3d 596 La. 2014
Id., 893 So.2d at 745 ().
Jones v. Black 145 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
13:4231 also changes the law by adopting the principle of issue preclusion”) (emphasis added); (holding that the common law version of res judicata permitting “collateral estoppel” was not applicable in Louisiana).
Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Paul J. Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Cox 128 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), ().
Milo Nickel v. Mb Industries, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
In dicta, the supreme court in Burguieres stated that the identity of parties can be satisfied “when a privy of one of the parties is involved.” Id at n.3, ().
Shaun Steckler v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Steckler v. Lafayette Consolidated Government 76 So. 3d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Regions Bank v. Weber 53 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Welch v.Crown Zellerbach Corp.
Myers v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 43 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
The Court noted that “[tjhere exists an | ¡identity of parties whenever the same parties, their successors, or others appear so long as they share the same ‘quality’ as parties.” Id., p. 10, 893 So.2d at 745
Insurance Co. of North America v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 10 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Louisiana law is clear that “[tjhere exists an identity of the parties whenever the same parties, their successors, or others appear so long as they share the same ‘quality’ as parties.”
Chevron USA, Inc. v. State 972 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Avenue Plaza, L.L.C. v. Falgoust, 96-0173, p. 6 (La.7/2/96), ; Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, p. 12 (La.1/16/96), ; Peter Wilbert Arbour, Comment, The Louisiana Concept of Res Judicata, 34 La.
Smith v. LeBlanc 966 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
see Horrell v. Horrell, 99-1093 (La.App.
Page v. City of Winnfield 925 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
P. Charles Calahan v. Scottsdale Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
“There exists an identity of parties whenever the same parties, their successors, 10 or others appear so long as they share the same ‘quality’ as parties.”
P. Charles Calahan, Aplc v. Scottsdale Ins. 903 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Explained Forum for Equality PAC v. McKeithen 893 So. 2d 738 La. 2005
we explained that "[t]here exists an identity of parties whenever the same parties, their successors, or others appear so long as they share the same `quality' as parties."
Alonzo v. STATE EX REL. DNR 884 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
MANDALAY OIL & GAS v. Energy Develop. Corp. 880 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
FIVE N COMPANY LLC v. Stewart 850 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Burguieres v. Pollingue 843 So. 2d 1049 La. 2003
Avenue Plaza, L.L.C. v. Falgoust, 96-0173, p. 6 (La.7/2/96), ; Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, p. 12 (La.1/16/96), ; Peter Wilbert Arbour, Comment, The Louisiana Concept of Res Judicata, 34 La.
Glass v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 832 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Conversely, Ochsner argues that the identity of parties requirement is met whenever the same parties, their successors, or others appear so long as they share the same "quality" as parties
Rollins v. Allstate Insurance Co. 828 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Thomas v. Janzen 800 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Elfer v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc. 804 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hudson v. City of Bossier 766 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Avenal v. State 757 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Thurston v. Thurston 740 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Gilbert v. Visone 708 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Ortego v. STATE, DOTD 689 So. 2d 1358 La. 1997
McClendon, 642 So.2d at 159 ( on remand, (La.App.
Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corp. 690 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Diez v. Daigle 686 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Ortego v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 673 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Gibert v. Driscoll 665 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
McClendon v. State, Dept. of Transp., on remand, (La.App.
Brown v. A.J. Barcia's Heating & Air Conditioning Inc. 657 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
McClendon v. State, Dept. of Transp. 642 So. 2d 157 La. 1994
Butler v. Reeder 628 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In analyzing the law of res judicata, the Louisiana Supreme Court, stated: As a result of our civilian heritage, res judicata under Louisiana law is perceived to be much narrower in scope than its counterpart in common law jurisdictions.