Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 359 So. 2d 154.

125 citing documents.

La. Cotton Ass'n Wkrs'comp. Group Self-Insurance Fund v. Tri-Parish Gin Company, Inc. 624 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Regional Hospital 618 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Greer v. State 616 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Westend Development Co. v. Westend Amusement Corp. 594 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Sj v. Pm 586 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Landmark Savings Bank, S.S.B. v. Bott 583 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Amerson v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 570 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Hannie 568 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
John Bailey Contractor, Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., [ ] supra; (La.
Hines v. Williams 567 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Finding this approach at odds with the narrow civilian concept of res judicata, termed collateral estoppel alien to, and inapplicable in, Louisiana.
Fust v. Fontenelle 558 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Butler v. Paciera 559 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
CHARLES E. McDONALD LAND DEV. v. Cashio 552 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
McNeal v. Normand 552 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1980) interpreted res judicata as follows: “: As a result of our civilian heritage, res judicata under Louisiana law is perceived to be much narrower in scope than its counterpart in common law jurisdictions.
Jensen Const. Co. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. OF DEV. 542 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Daul, supra at 1210, 1211.
Preis v. Standard Coffee Service Co. 534 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Landry v. Thibaut 523 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
the court explained, at 156: As a result of our civilian heritage, res judicata under Louisiana law is perceived to be much narrower in scope than its counterpart in common law jurisdictions.
O'BANNON FOR O'BANNON v. Azar 506 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bowman v. Weill Const. Co. 502 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Funai v. Air Center, Inc. 499 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
With respect to identity of parties, appeal after remand, (La.App.
Ryan v. Grandison Trust 490 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
These provisions establish a presumption of correctness and preclude relit-igation of the object of the judgment when there is (1) an identity of the parties, (2) an identity of the thing demanded and (3) an identity of “cause.”
In Re Beychok 484 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Welch, [v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.] supra [ ]
Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi 485 So. 2d 915 La. 1986
Morris v. Parish of Jefferson 487 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Cooper v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 481 So. 2d 611 La. 1986
Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp. 479 So. 2d 904 La. 1985
Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 471 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi 474 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Dart v. Ehret 466 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court reviewed the history of res judicata under Louisiana law and at page 156 said: As a result of our civilian heritage, res judicata under Louisiana law is perceived to be much narrower in scope than its counterpart in common law jurisdictions.
Lowe v. Rivers 465 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Lococo v. Lococo 462 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
MUT. FIRE, MARINE & INLAND INS. v. Electro Corp. 461 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Adams v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES 458 So. 2d 1295 La. 1984
Louisiana Weekly Publishing Co. v. First National Bank of Commerce 455 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Gross v. Continental Insurance Co. 451 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 2286; on remand, (La.
Mara v. Mara 452 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Cornish v. Freeman 451 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that, "Louisiana legislative authority for res judicata establishes a presumption of correctness and precludes relitigation of the object of the judgment only when there is (1) an identity of the parties, (2) an identity of the `cause' and (3) an identity of the thing
Galle v. Allstate Ins. Co. 451 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Lowe v. Rivers 448 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
DAUL INS. AGENCY, INC. v. Parish of Jefferson 447 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
W.Q. Wise, Inc. v. Lewing 446 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 2286; ” The theory of civilian res judicata is that matters actually litigated and finally adjudged are presumed correct and, thus, should not be contradicted in a subsequent suit.
Lowe v. Continental Ins. Co. 437 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Palermo 436 So. 2d 536 La. 1983
WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. DERBES 436 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Derbes 436 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Wilson v. HJ Wilson Co., Inc. 430 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Slocum v. Daigre 424 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Succession of Kilpatrick 422 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
our supreme court stated: As a result of our civilian heritage, res judicata under Louisiana law is perceived to be much narrower in scope than its counterpart in common law jurisdictions.
Gremillion v. Town of Cottonport 420 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
held, on page 156, that: “As a result of our civilian heritage, res judicata under Louisiana law is perceived to be much narrower in scope than its counterpart in common law jurisdictions.
Braquet v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 419 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Continental Insurance Co. v. Lute 418 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982