Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 360 So. 2d 842.

124 citing documents.

State v. Alexander 976 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Green 598 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Laird 572 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Williams 567 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Whitaker 543 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Walker 542 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 894.1 provides helpful criteria for this purpose, State v. Telsee, 425 So.2d at 1253 ; State v. Sepuvado, 367 So.2d at 769 , so that the individual sentence imposed on a particular defendant is tailored to the particular circumstances of the case, State v. Telsee, 425 So.2d at 1253 ; (La.App.
State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Pattillo 534 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Langley 534 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Edwards 532 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Clayton 532 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Ravia 532 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Fontenot 532 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Quintero 527 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Deville 525 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Burchett 526 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Willis 527 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Brown 527 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Fisher 525 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State ex rel. Sam v. Becker 519 So. 2d 122 La. 1988
State v. Montgomery 525 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Senegal 524 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Bell 524 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Thompson 520 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
[State v. ] Jones [ ], supra; ” The record before us reflects that the trial judge scrupulously complied with the statutory guidelines of Article 894.1, mentioning, in his written reasons for sentencing, each of the eleven mitigating factors in Section B of Article 894.1.
State v. Vanvorst 505 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Mims 501 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Lutes 496 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Defendant asserts that the trial court failed to consider certain mitigating factors listed in article 894.1
State v. Prudhomme 499 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Hoffman v. Hoffman 480 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Robins 479 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Wright 476 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Kelly 469 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Childs 466 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Telsee, [ ]; (La.
State v. Vampran 459 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. McCutchen 459 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 453 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Guerra 450 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
potential for rehabilitation.’ see also
State v. Coats 449 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Jack 448 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Goodson 444 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Dugas 441 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
State v. Cox 441 So. 2d 723 La. 1983
State v. Wade 442 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Stone 438 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Remedies 438 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
potential for rehabilitation.’ see also
State v. Cotten 438 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Reynolds 436 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Dokes, supra; (La.
State v. Boyette 434 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
does not satisfy the requirement that the trial court state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis therefore in imposing sentence.” see also