Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Villaume v. Villaume, 363 So. 2d 448.

135 citing documents.

Evangelia Bilalis v. Wallace Drennan and Zurich American Insurance Company La. 2025
They argue that Article 1951 allows amendment only “where the amendment takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana and the Vermilion Parish School Board v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Bryan Arnold Richman, Jr. v. the Travelers Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Timothy Baptiste v. Minerals Technology, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“Thus, the judgment may be amended by the court where the amendment takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.”
Silton Ardoin v. Gde Renovations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana, Through Its Department of Transportation and Development v. Ruvim Kimakovkiy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Financial Casualty and Surety, Inc. v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Jeremy Locke v. MADCON Corporation La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Kenneth M. Dean v. Anthony Dimattia, also known as Anthony Paul Miller La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Lawrence Franks and Robbie Franks v. State National Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
” Considering same, Appellants urge that the June 4, 2021 judgment correctly took away State National’s liability for any amount over its policy limits.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Dorothy A. Shaw Lee v. North Louisiana Bidco, LLC consolidated with North Louisiana Bidco, LLC v. Melvin Shaw, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
A “judgment may be amended by the court where the amendment takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” (La.
George W. Wolfe II v. Lindsey Renee Breaud La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Joseph Kolwe, Jr. v. Civil and Structural Engineers,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
art. 1951 allows that a “judgment may be amended by the court where the amendment takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.”
Kolwe v. Civil & Structural Eng'rs, Inc. 264 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Villaume v. Villaume , , 450 (La.1978).
Jessica Langley Thomas v. Carroll F. Thomas, II. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
–51 (La.1978) the supreme court held that “[a]s a general rule, a final judgment is not subject to substantive amendment by the trial judge on his motion or motion of any party.
Thomas v. Thomas 263 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Villaume v. Villaume , , 450-51 (La.1978) the supreme court held that "[a]s a general rule, a final judgment is not subject to substantive amendment by the trial judge on his motion or motion of any party.
Smith v. Smith 245 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Villaume v. Villaume , ; Crawford v. Crawford , 49,059 (La.
Tobice Pritchard v. Geico Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
the supreme court noted “the judgment may be amended by the court where the amendment takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” In the instant case, according to the original judgment, the minor was incorrectly cast in judgment for damages and court costs.
Pritchard v. Geico Ins. Co. 242 So. 3d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In Villaume v. Villaume , , 450 (La.1978), the supreme court noted "the judgment may be amended by the court where the amendment takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment."
Lewis v. Hart 221 So. 3d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Corey Lewis v. Tyrissa Hart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Plaisance v. Jefferson Parish School Board 218 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Greene v. Succession of Alvarado 210 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Freeman v. Zara's Food Store, Inc. 204 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Crescent City Cabinets & Flooring, L.L.C. v. Grace Tama Development Co. 203 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Entrada Co. v. Pressley 200 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
4 Thomas v. Williams, 48,003 (La.App.2d Cir.05/15/13), .
Adams v. South Lafourche Levee District 199 So. 3d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
George Raymond Williams, M.D., Orthopaedic Surgery, Apmllc v. Bestcomp, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
see also Tenneco, Inc. v. Harold Stream Inv.
Williams v. Bestcomp, Inc. 185 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Gloria Welch v. Southwind Nursing & Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Welch v. Southwind Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 177 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
James E. Stewart, Sr. v. Dianne Denley Stewart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
An amendment generally is permissible if it “takes 24 nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” [Footnote 25 Three in the trial court’s judgment provides: “Villaume v. Villaume, 26 (La.
Stewart v. Stewart 166 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
An amendment generally is permissible if it “takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” [Footnote Three in the trial court’s judgment provides: “ (La.
Monster Rentals, LLC v. Coonass Construction of Acadiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Regina Beth-Ann Gilley Ast v. David Lee Ast, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
§ 1408(a)(4)(B) The kind of amendment allowed by Art.1951 is one that “takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” [, 450] (La.1978); [see also] Thomas v. Williams, [48,003 (La.App.
Ast v. Ast 162 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
§ 1408 (a)(4)(B) The kind of amendment allowed by Art. 1951 is one that “takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” [, 450] (La.1978); [see also ] Thomas v. Williams, [48,003 (La.App.
Monster Rentals, LLC v. Coonass Construction of Acadiana, LLC 162 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wells v. Wells 150 So. 3d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Crawford v. Crawford 139 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
The kind of amendment allowed by Art.1951 is one that “takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.” Thomas v. Williams, supra.
Bates v. City of New Orleans 137 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1169 (La.1891); -51 (La.1978)).
State v. Black 144 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Clarence M. Leland v. Lafayette Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Sanderford v. Mason 135 So. 3d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Thomas v. Williams 115 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Farmer's Seafood Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety, Office of State Police 97 So. 3d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Caldwell v. Leche, 08-0790 (La.App.
Paragon Lofts Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Paragon Lofts, L.L.C. 55 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
Lloyd Bordelon v. Howard J. Desselle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
See Bourgeois, 846 So.2d at 695 () (wherein the court stated that an amendment is not substantive if it “takes nothing from or adds nothing to the original judgment.”) Unquestionably, the October 2009 judgment was not an amendment to the August 2009 judgment since it took something from the prior judgment, i.e., it reduced the amount awa
Suprun v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 40 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010