DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Arbuthnot, 367 So. 2d 296.

21 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana in the Interest of D.W. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
  • Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a defendant’s conviction on the basis of a police officer’s hearsay testimony regarding a non-testifying witness’ positive identification of the defendant.
  • Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a defendant’s conviction on the basis of a police officer’s hearsay testimony regarding a non-testifying witness’ positive identification of the defendant.
  • State of Louisiana v. Montrail Williams AKA Montrail Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    art. 916, n. 2 (La.1979).
  • State ex rel. S.L. 94 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a defendant’s conviction on the basis of a police officer’s hearsay testimony regarding a non-testifying witness’ positive identification of the defendant.
  • State v. Brown 956 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Smothers 927 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Hartwell 866 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    (1979), the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed *906 the Defendant's conviction on the basis of a police officer's hearsay testimony regarding a non-testifying witness' positive identification of him.
  • State v. Carter 762 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Soraparu 649 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    for the proposition that an eye witness to a crime who identifies a suspect yet who does not testify at trial may not be quoted by a police officer at trial.
  • State v. Ballom 523 So. 2d 860 La. 1988
  • State v. Dawson 490 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Williams 483 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    15:434 two cases saying that hearsay testimony is unfair because it permits introduction of out-of-court statements which cannot be tested by cross-examination of the alleged declarant.
  • State v. Buie 477 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    The issue of whether or not assignments of error urged by one co-defendant may be presumed to have been urged by another was discussed, but not decided
  • State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
  • State v. Armstead 432 So. 2d 837 La. 1983
  • State v. Hudgins 400 So. 2d 889 La. 1981
  • State v. Bazile 386 So. 2d 349 La. 1980
  • State v. Foote 379 So. 2d 1058 La. 1980
  • State v. Vaughn 378 So. 2d 905 La. 1979
    we set forth the following definition of hearsay: "...