Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Parish of Jefferson v. Jacobs 623 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
W. Handlin Marine, Inc. v. Gulf States Marine, Inc. 624 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Norfleet v. Southern Baptist Hospital 623 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Odom v. Claiborne Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 623 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Johns v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc. 622 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Poland v. Glenn 623 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Trammel v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. 637 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Tolliver v. Crawford 621 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Moody v. Moody 622 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Cherry v. Herques 623 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Austin v. St. Charles General Hospital 621 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Finally, clearly the Fund cannot substitute its ideas for the findings and final judgment of a trial court.
Hunter v. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 620 So. 2d 1149 La. 1993
Stobart v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Transportation
Coley v. State, Through DOTD 621 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Ware v. Medical Protective Ins. Co. 621 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Wimberly v. Gatch 621 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
That well-supported finding should not be disturbed upon review, and reflects that claims from all remaining instances of misconduct have apparently prescribed.
Dillman v. Puckett 619 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Broussard v. Domingue 619 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 619 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Goza v. Cornwell 622 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Cline v. St. Jude Medical Center, Inc. 619 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
McKenzie v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 621 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In Re Medical Review Panel Bilello 621 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Roddy v. Crawford 618 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Talamo v. Shad 619 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Pereira v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 620 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Fiffie v. Borden, Inc. 618 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Billingsley v. Billingsley 618 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Lindon v. Terminix Services, Inc. 617 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Hawthorne v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. 618 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater 618 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Savannah v. Anthony's Auto Sales, Inc. 618 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Martin v. Riverview Medical Center 618 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Smith v. Louisiana Department of Corrections 618 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Hill's Mortuary, Inc. v. Hill 619 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Boyd v. WASHINGTON-ST. TAMMANY ELEC. CO-OP. 618 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Yount v. Maisano 616 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
France v. Interstate Ford, Inc. 617 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Thomas v. Highlands Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 877 La. 1993
Stobart v. State Through DOTD 617 So. 2d 880 La. 1993
Adriatic Insurance Co. v. Holt 617 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Skrantz v. Skrantz 617 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Roland v. Tedesco 616 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Young v. Armadores De Cabotaje, SA 617 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Katsanis v. State Farm General Ins. Co. 615 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Leonard v. Leonard 615 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Alford v. Woods 614 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Archinard v. Rapides Parish School Board 614 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Shaw v. Bourn 615 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Beckham v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Jordan v. Intercontinental Bulktank Corp. 621 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Ordinarily, trial court findings of fact are reviewed on appeal under the manifest error (clearly wrong) standard [ ] and trial court quantum awards are reviewed on appeal under the abuse of discretion standard [ ].