Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Mundy v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 609 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Gagnard v. Baldridge 612 So. 2d 732 La. 1993
Wise v. Lapworth 614 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Jefferson v. Monumental General Ins. Co. 607 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Funk v. Louisiana Underwriters Insurance Co. 613 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lanclos v. Lanclos 614 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Perniciaro v. Martin Marietta Corp. 613 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Laper v. BOARD OF COM'RS, PORT OF NEW ORLEANS 617 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
First Downtown Dev. v. Cimochowski 613 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State ex rel. Gray v. Hogan 613 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Bates v. Willis 613 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Succession of Hirt 612 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. Mullone 612 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Hines v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 613 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Nelson v. Pendleton Memorial Hosp. 612 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
City of New Orleans v. Miller 612 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Jure v. Raviotta 612 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Johnston v. Fontana 610 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Touchard v. Williams 606 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Lynch v. Hanover Ins. Co. 611 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Hall v. Hall 611 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Bourque v. Riviana Foods, Inc. 611 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Vascocu v. Acme Cement Products, Inc. 610 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Jessen v. Dr. Kenneth W. Wimberly, DDS 610 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
states that, "the appellate court should not disturb [the trial judge's or jury's] findings of fact unless it is clearly wrong."
Bailey v. Smelser Oil & Gas, Inc. 609 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Britton v. Morton Thiokol, Inc., (La.App.
Smith v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 609 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bergeron v. Southeastern Louisiana University 610 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Stubbs v. Stubbs 610 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Dawson v. Dawson 610 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
DeSambourg v. BOARD OF COM'RS, GRAND PRAIRIE LEVEE DIST. 608 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Breen v. Soileau 609 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Hutchins v. Hill Petroleum Co. 609 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Mindful of our duty as a we agree with Artigue, Harold Carrier, and Dupre-Carrier-Godchaux.
Cradeur v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 607 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Cradeur v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 607 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Simmons on Behalf of Simmons v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASU. INS. CO. 607 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
However, explained that the appellate review of facts is not completed by reading so much of the record as will reveal a factual basis for the finding in the trial court; there must be a further determination that the finding is not clearly wrong.
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Donaldson v. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING, OF MAPLEWOOD, INC. 606 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Charpentier v. Lammico Ins. Co. 606 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Hayes v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 606 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Dominici v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 606 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Reeves v. Reeves 607 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1990), writ denied
Smith v. Two" R" Drilling Co., Inc. 606 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Hae Woo Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. 605 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 603 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Succession of Ruppert 602 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Cotton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 602 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
As such it is due broad discretion by this court and may not be upset unless it is “clearly wrong” or “manifestly erroneous.”
Britton v. Morton Thiokol, Inc. 604 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Estate of Thomas v. STATE, DOTD 604 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by