Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.
- Llorence v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 558 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Allbritton v. Allbritton 561 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. 561 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 558 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Rosell v. ESCO 558 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 1106 La. 1990
- Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co. 559 So. 2d 467 La. 1990
- Crowell v. City of Alexandria 558 So. 2d 216 La. 1990
- Snow v. Mid-American Indem. Co. 557 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Watson v. CR Bard, Inc. 557 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- BOSSIER MED. PROP. v. Abbott & Williams Constr. Co. 557 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Devereux v. Allstate Ins. Co. 557 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Loyd v. IMC Fertilizer, Inc.
557 So. 2d 1078
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Gonzales v. Babco Farm Inc., supra.
- Holmes v. Baton Rouge Water Works Co. 558 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Armstrong v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Brooks v. City of Baton Rouge 558 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Thompson v. Thompson 559 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Frick v. Ensor 557 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Bergez v. Simmons
557 So. 2d 444
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
” Furthermore, the Louisiana Supreme Court recently addressed the manifest error-clearly wrong standard to be used by a reviewing court in Rosell v. Esco d/b/a Jolly Elevator Corp., and at page 844 said: “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the fact finder’s choice
- Whitney Nat. Bank v. Poydras Ctr. Assoc. 557 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
State ex rel. S.S.
557 So. 2d 407
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State in Interest of Cason, supra.
- Smith v. City of New Orleans 557 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Duncan v. STATE, DOTD 556 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Waits v. Waits 556 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Draper v. Draper 556 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Estes v. Kroger Co. 556 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Convent Marine Companies v. Delta Bulk Terminal, Inc. 556 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Nichols v. US Rentals, Inc. 556 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Sicarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 556 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 555 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Fisher v. Dept. of Public Safety 555 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
Melancon v. J.B. Thibodeaux, Inc.
557 So. 2d 256
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
” After carefully reviewing the record, we do not find that the jury’s decision was clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.
- Kennedy v. Parrino 555 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Sandoz v. Dolphin Services, Inc. 555 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Tabor v. Doctors Memorial Hospital 554 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Fonseca v. Hall 555 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Varacalle v. Turner 556 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Lang v. Cage 554 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Abdon Callais Boat Rentals, Inc. v. LA. P&L CO. 555 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Shroyer v. Grush
555 So. 2d 534
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
The "manifest error" standard established in Canter, supra, as follows: [A]ppellate review of facts is not completed by reading so much of the record as will reveal a reasonable factual basis for the finding in the trial court; there must be a further determination that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong.
- Guillie v. State Department of Transportation & Development 554 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Clouatre v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 557 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Pittman v. Pomeroy 552 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Litton v. Ford Motor Co. 554 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- McElveen v. City of New Orleans 553 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Cobb v. State Farm Insurance Co. 552 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Falgoust v. Richardson Industries, Inc.
552 So. 2d 1348
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
As with all factual determinations, such findings cannot be reversed unless the record discloses that they are clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous
- McGowan v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 555 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Palmer v. General Health, Inc. 552 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Brandt v. Rayford 552 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989