Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Lambert v. Wheels R Rolling Skate Center 552 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Spillars 552 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Clifton v. Liner 552 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Freeman v. Freeman 552 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Michel v. Michel, supra.
Moody v. Terry's Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. 552 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
White v. McCoy 552 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Ford v. Sears 552 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 551 So. 2d 1282 La. 1989
Molbert v. Toepfer 550 So. 2d 183 La. 1989
Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 550 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Green v. Hodges Stock Yard, Inc. 552 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Keiser v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad 550 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the court further explained that a factual determination should not be disturbed unless the entire record shows that that determination is “clearly wrong”.
Professional Const. Services, Inc. v. Lee M. Marcello Contractor, Inc. 550 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Dailey v. Royal Insurance Co. 551 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Woods v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., (La.App.
Bernardi v. Bernardi 551 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Broussard v. Massey-Ferguson Co. 549 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Pitts v. Bailes 551 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Ortiz v. King & Co. 550 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Glass v. Wiltz 551 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Brooks v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 550 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Sj v. Sm 550 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Sills v. Mid-South Sports, Inc. 550 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
S.J. v. S.M. 550 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Foster v. Craig Equipment Co. 550 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State in Interest of Braden v. Nash 550 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Lawless v. New Orleans Police Dept. 550 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Rosell v. Esco 549 So. 2d 840 La. 1989
Hogan v. Hogan 549 So. 2d 267 La. 1989
Tassin v. New Orleans Delivery Service 550 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Reilly v. Gene Ducote Volkswagen, Inc. 549 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Wheeler v. Clearview Dodge Sales, supra.
American Security Bank of Ville Platte v. Deshotel 548 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Hobgood v. Aucoin 551 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Instead, the trial court found as a fact that Mr. Hobgood failed to show “by a preponderance of the evidence any causal connection between Mr. Hobgood’s disability and loss of income.” and determined that “[T]he trial court was not clearly wrong in finding as a fact that Hobgood failed to prove that he will sustain any diminution of earning capacity.” The instant case is not in conflict with Henry and Mr. Hobgood is not entitled to a rehearing en banc.
Weems v. Weems 548 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Bergeron v. Bergeron, supra; (La.
Wisinger v. Casten 550 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
St. Claire v. Lewis 550 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
on remand , writ denied (La.App.
Nguyen v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarket 548 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
This court may not disturb the trial court’s decision unless manifestly *345 erroneous, or when the evidence is such that no other conclusion could be drawn, (La.App.
Cascio v. Continental Casualty Co. 547 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Puckett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 546 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Young v. Armstrong 546 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Ren-Car Leasing Co. v. Duncan 546 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 546 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., supra .
Guidry v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 546 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has further stated that: ‘[t]he appellate review of facts is not completed by reading so much of the record as will reveal a reasonable factual basis for the finding in the trial court; there must be a further determination that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).’ , at page 1333 (La.1978).” Accordingly, this court is obliged to give great weight to the factual conclusions of the jury as the trier of fact in th
Dossett v. Hub City Bank & Trust Co. 546 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
McCauley v. Chapman 546 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Doucet v. B & R Petroleum Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
This standard of appellate review was not meant to be applied so as to require upholding a trial court ruling simply “when the evidence before the trier of fact furnishes a reasonable basis for its finding.”
Snoke v. M & M DODGE, INC. 546 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Fontenot v. Fontenot 546 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
McLaughlin v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 549 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Stallion v. Morris 546 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jimco, Inc. v. Paving Contractors, Inc. 546 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989