Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

McFarland v. Budget Rent A Car 544 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Wright v. Barnes 541 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
LaCaze v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 541 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Unis v. JTS Constructors/Managers, Inc. 541 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Weber v. Buccola-McKenzie, Inc. 541 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
While questions of fact are generally left to the jury and their findings should not be disturbed unless they are clearly wrong ( Soileau, supra; [La.1978]), we are of the opinion that there is manifest error in the jury's verdict, and that the jury was clearly wrong in not assigning these percentages.
Guidry v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Kuykendall v. Circle, Inc. 539 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Virgil v. American Guarantee & Inability Insurance Company
Cunningham v. Dicarlo 539 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Surgi v. Otis Elevator Co. 541 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
STATE, DOTD v. Fakouri 541 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Lockette v. Hartford Insurance Co. 539 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
Pardee v. Natchitoches Parish Police Jury 539 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Manifest error, in its simplest terms, means “clearly wrong.”
Professional Credit Services of New Orleans, Inc. v. Skipper 543 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Snell v. United Parcel Services, Inc. 543 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Harris v. Doucette 539 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
West v. Jones, 411 So.2d at 533 .
Ard v. Kraft, Inc. 540 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
: The appellate review of facts is not completed by reading so much of the record as will reveal a reasonable factual basis for the finding in the trial court; *1175 there must be a further determination that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).
Gaffney v. Saenger Theatre Partnership, Ltd. 539 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Martin Flanagan Design, Inc. v. R.L. Stern & Sons, Ltd. 540 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Smith v. Orkin Exterminating Co. 540 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
M & M Roustabout Service, Inc. v. Hydro-Kem Services, Inc. 540 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Carney v. Lone Star Life Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Thomas v. Hartford Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guitreau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Smith v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. 540 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Sparks v. TULANE MED. CTR. HOSP. & CL. 537 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Dowe v. Grady 540 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Virgil v. American Guar.
Central Business Forms, Inc. v. N-Sure Systems, Inc. 540 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Purvis v. American Motors Corp. 538 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 538 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Thomas v. Thomas 539 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Roberts v. Roberts 542 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
STATE, DOTD v. Caroline Atkins Crawford Business Trusts 538 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Thibodeaux v. Audubon Insurance Co. 539 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Manifest error, in its simplest terms, means “clearly wrong.”
Soileau v. HCA HEALTH SERV. OF LA., INC. 539 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Hageman v. Foreman 539 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Crawford v. Howard 539 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Esteve v. Iberia Parish Hospital 539 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Allen v. Allen 539 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Terry v. Guillory 538 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Harris v. Wallette 538 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Merchants Tr. & Sav. Bank v. DON'S INTERN., INC. 538 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Logan v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 538 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
4th Cir.1986), writ denied (La 1979).
Ambrose v. Fluor Constructors, Inc. 537 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
St. Hill v. Tabor 532 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Morris v. Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp Resort 539 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Explained Eppling v. Eppling 537 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
is that even though the Appellate Court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable, it should not disturb reasonable findings of the trial court when there is conflict in the testimony.
Jones v. Lingenfelder 537 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
*1279 to the effect that the trial court erred in refusing to inform the jury about a stipulation of insurance coverage and limits because the jury is entitled to know all the evidence.
Wise v. Dufresne 537 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Pace v. Loyal Order of Moose, Metairie Lodge 2195 538 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Swain on Behalf of Estate of Swain v. Life Ins. Co. of Louisiana 537 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
McClelland v. Security Indus.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by