Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Rogers v. Pizza Hut 547 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Explained Jones v. Carolina Casualty Co. 547 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Darby v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America 545 So. 2d 1022 La. 1989
Boehm v. French 548 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Henderson v. Guillory 546 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
1973); on remand , writ denied
American Bank & Trust Co. of Coushatta v. McDowell 545 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
In re Civil Service Commission Layoff Investigation 546 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Ginsberg v. Hontas 545 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Humphrey v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 546 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Estopinal v. National Tea Co. 545 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Kelley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 545 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. American Holding Corp. 548 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Molbert v. Toepfer 540 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Bishop v. Nelson 544 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jones v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 544 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Crupe v. Huval Bakery, Inc. 544 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
Cormier v. Jack Eckerd Corp. 544 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Marcantel v. Breaux 544 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
at page 1333 (La.1978), where the court stated: “We said the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error.
Frederick v. General Motors Corp. 544 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has further stated that: ‘[t]he appellate review of facts is not completed by reading so much of the record as will reveal a reasonable factual basis for the finding in the trial court; there must be a further determination that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).’ , at page 1333 (La.1978).” As this case was tried to a jury and their verdict depended to a large extent on the testimony of the expert witnesses, w
Stevens v. Coca-Cola Co. 544 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Distefano v. Bell 544 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Canter *572 v. Koehring Company, (La.
Toth v. Ensco Environmental Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
However, this principle does not require the appellate court to affirm the trier of fact's refusal to accept as credible uncontradicted testimony, Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co., supra , or greatly preponderant objectively-corroborated testimony, where the record indicates no sound reason for its rejection and where the factual finding itself has been reached by overlooking applicable legal principles.
Harris v. Bell 543 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 544 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Bourne v. Seventh Ward General Hosp. 546 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Ruffin v. Leevac Corp. 543 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
D & O CONTR., INC. v. Terrebonne Parish Sch. Bd. 545 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Doell v. Lachney 544 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State in Interest of BS v. PS 542 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Tedeton v. Coffman 544 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Morris v. Orleans Parish School Board 544 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Holloway v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 549 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 543 So. 2d 472 La. 1989
Durand v. Horace Mann Life Insurance Co. 543 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Rosell v. Esco 539 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Perry v. Broussard 542 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Aguillard v. Industrial Const. Co., Inc. 542 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company
Faulk v. Mailhes 541 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Johnson v. Midland Insurance Co. 541 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Chapman v. Pelican Truck Lines, Inc. 541 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Zeno v. Smith 541 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State ex rel. Hulin 543 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Manifest error, in its simplest terms, means “clearly wrong.”
Petersen v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 543 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Eldridge v. Bonanza Family Restaurant 542 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Franklin v. Paul Dupuis & Associates 543 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Warner v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 543 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Nicoll v. Barriere Construction Co. 542 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guenther v. Zoning Appeals Bd. 542 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Ross v. Schultz 542 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Miller v. Thompson 542 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989