Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Kelly v. Dearmond 532 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Romero v. Pough 532 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Andrus v. Fontenot 532 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Holcomb, supra; Kilpatrick, supra.
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Landry 532 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Hymel v. Halmar, Inc. 532 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Allen v. State 535 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Coleman v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 535 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
In re State ex rel. F.B.M. 535 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
Pittman v. City of New Orleans 531 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
While reviewing this evidence
Lupo v. State, Division of the Administration, Office of Risk Management 531 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Scott v. Sears Roebuck Co.
Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Austral Oil Co. 531 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
e the J. J. Duncan was substituted for the Kim C. He was present when Sanders’ tool pusher, Tony Vallois, telephoned Terrebonne Towing and asked Terrbeonne to furnish the services of the Kim C. As the foregoing review of the trial record establishes a reasonable factual basis for the findings of the trier of fact and also establishes that the findings are not clearly wrong, the judgment of the court below is affirmed, all at the plaintiff’s costs.
Turner v. Turner 533 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Orlando v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 534 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Edwards v. Heiman 534 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In determining whether manifest error exists, appellate courts have a greater obligation than simply determining that some supportive evidence exists to support the trial court’s holding — they must make a “further determination that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Johnson v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 531 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Tastet v. Joyce 531 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Richard v. Mangion 535 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Gonzales v. Babco Farm, Inc. 535 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
on remand , writ denied (La.
Automated Building Corp. v. City of Bossier City 530 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Gonzales v. Barco Farm, Inc. 535 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
on remand , writ denied .
Tenneco Oil Co. v. Hines 535 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Dickson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 535 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Williams v. Anthony 534 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
C.J. Calamia Construction Co. v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railroad 529 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Zimmerman v. Collins 529 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(Manifest error standard is equally applicable to written reports, records and depositions.).
Gottlieb v. Tulane Univ. of Louisiana 529 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
The standard of appellate review of a
First National Bank of Commerce v. Breaux 529 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Burk v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 529 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Liuzza v. D & M Welding, Inc. 528 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Funez v. Jefferson Parish School Bd. 528 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Fontenot v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 529 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
S. Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. PRO. ANS. SERV. OF LAFAYETTE, INC. 527 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Leleux v. Morrow's Sports Center, Inc. 527 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Miller v. Hilton 527 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
1st Cir.1980), writ denied
Brown v. Smith 527 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Littleton v. Piazza 527 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Moreau v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 527 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Prince v. Conoco, Inc. 529 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Moreau v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 527 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 527 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Bustamante v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 528 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Sykes v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. 531 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Presley v. Smith 527 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Williams v. Williams 527 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Dupuy v. Riley 528 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. 528 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Pearce v. Baltazar 529 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Martin v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. 531 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1978), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a reviewing court must give great weight to the conclusions of the trier of fact, and should not disturb reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact in the absence of manifest error.
Ogletree v. Willis-Knighton Memorial Hosp., Inc. 530 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Mohr v. State Farm Ins. Co. 528 So. 2d 144 La. 1988

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by