Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Nation v. Wilmore 525 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Koury v. Lanier Exp., Inc. 528 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Bartlett v. Reese 526 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Green v. Cement Products Services, Inc. 526 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Savoie v. Deere & Co. 528 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
CLEMENT III v. Armoniet 527 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Campbell v. Tidwell, supra.
Cucchero v. Bituminous Casualty Corp. 527 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Seaberry v. Smith 527 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Ladnier v. Villafranco 525 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. 528 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 520 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 527 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Wilkinson v. Landreneau 525 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Sherman v. American Deposit Insurance Co. 525 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Davis v. Natchitoches Parish School Board 525 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. of Alexandria v. Holiday Inn of Leesville Partnership 525 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Cypress Oilfield Contr. v. McGoldrick Oil 525 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Dorsey v. Williams 525 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Waller Oil Co. v. Brown 528 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State ex rel. Kimball v. Rollins 528 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
SHREVERPORT GR. EMPIRE BROAD., INC. v. Chicoine 528 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
on remand , writ denied (La.App.
Fields v. Senior Citizens Center, Inc. 528 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Reid v. North Caddo Memorial Hosp. 528 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Butts v. Cunningham, supra; Matthews v. La.
Norred v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 526 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Foster v. COLONEL SANDERS KY. FRIED CHICKEN, INC. 526 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Ray v. Mid South Underwriters, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
In order to overturn the lower court's decision in this case, we would have to hold: (1) that its factual findings were manifestly erroneous, or (2) that its conclusions of law, given the facts before it, were clearly erroneous.
Notto v. Brown 525 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Branham v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 525 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Calandro's Supermarket v. Hussman Refrig. 525 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
DeGruy v. Pala, Inc. 525 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Bridges v. Osborne 525 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Michel v. Ascension Parish Police Jury 524 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
O'NEAL v. Chris Steak House, Inc. 525 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Trapani v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 524 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Harrison v. Keller 524 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
we find no clear error in finding defendant at fault or in the degree of fault that the court assigned.
Jordan v. Central Louisiana Telephone Co. 525 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Pesson v. Kleckley 526 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
King v. Louviere 524 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
commonly cited as authority for the manifest error standard of appellate review, held that both the nonowner-driver and the owner of a vehicle which experiences sudden brake failure are both custodians of the vehicle for the purposes of article 2317 and, therefore, are strictly responsible for any damage wh
Hostetler v. W. Gray & Co., Inc. 523 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
on remand, , writ denied, (La.App.
Snyder v. Taylor 523 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Patel v. Bank of the Mid South 522 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Stephens v. DeLoach 522 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Manion v. Pollingue 524 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
WL Somner Co. v. Pacific-Atlantic Oil 522 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Wall v. Alleman 519 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
We are guided by the manifest error rule, under which we must not only find a factual basis for the trial court's findings but make a determination that they are not clearly wrong.
Kerr v. American Tugs of Venice, Inc. 522 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
A finding of causation is a finding of fact and, as such
Nathan v. Home Depot 522 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Harris v. State through Huey P. Long Mem.
Ford v. Golemi, Albrecht Ins. 522 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The standard of appellate review of a
Dill v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 522 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
2324.1; and also that the court abused its much discretion in making its damage awards.
Tracy v. Jefferson Parish 523 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by