Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Lofton v. Louisiana Pac. Corp. 410 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Bridges v. Reliance Ins. Co. 410 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Darby v. Lemoine 410 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Rapides Const., Inc. v. Gaspard 411 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Castille v. Melancon 410 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.
CCH, INC. v. Heard 410 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Ryals v. Home Ins. Co. 410 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Siler v. Guillotte 410 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Bray v. Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, Inc. 409 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
LaBorde v. Eagle Trucking Co. 409 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
3 to the effect that delictual responsibility [does] not necessarily depend upon negligent acts, but upon fault, and that the custodian of an instrumentality that poses an unreasonable risk of injury to another is at fault.
Poland v. American Mutual Insurance 409 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Gonzalez v. Lockette 410 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Freeman v. Lee & Leon Oil Co., Inc. 409 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Webb v. Hughes 408 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Franco v. Kar Products, Inc. 409 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Jefferson v. Landwehr 409 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Blue Ridge Insurance v. Belle Alliance Homes, Inc. 408 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
First State Bank & Trust Co. of East Baton Rouge Parish v. Dalton's Heating & Air Conditioning Co. 408 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Standard Fire Insurance v. Mapes 408 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Stewart v. Vidrine 408 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Langlois v. Jarreau 409 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The trial court was not clearly wrong
Carter v. City Parish Government of East Baton Rouge 409 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Otzenberger v. Atlas Construction Co. 408 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
We can not say that he was clearly wrong
Baton Rouge General Hospital v. Hotard 408 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Aleman v. Favret Co., Inc.
Union Local P-1476 of the Amalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen v. Union Citizens Club of Terrebonne Parish 408 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Schiro v. Viola 408 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The issues of whether or not the court erred in finding defendants were not the owners of the dog which attacked plaintiff is strictly factual and, as such
Southbend Contractors, Inc. v. Parish of Jefferson 408 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1981
Thus, there is presented to us the classic issue of “evidence before the trier of fact which, upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding” established as a
Preyan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 408 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Dixon v. Tugwell 409 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Patterson v. Jackson 409 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Williams v. Ourso 409 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Johnston v. Johnston 408 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Glover v. Southern Pipe & Supply Co. 408 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
STATE, ETC. v. Guillory 407 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Jolivette v. City of Lafayette 408 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Goudchaux v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 407 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Noblit v. Noblit 407 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Hord v. Hord 407 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Campbell v. Tidwell 407 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Woods v. Ratliff 407 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Lacombe v. Greathouse 407 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Dyson v. Gulf Modular Corporation, supra; (La.
Duhon v. Dugas 407 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Zone v. Town of Bunkie 407 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Babineaux v. Continental Oil Co. 407 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Canter v. Koehring Company, supra; Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Breaux v. Domingues 407 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
We feel that, regardless of this testimony, the fact is that this widow is in necessitous circumstances, and that the trial judge was clearly wrong in holding to the contrary
Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. Roberts 408 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
1978), on remand, (La.App.
Crochet v. American Tobacco Co. 407 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
1978), on remand, (La.App.
Parish v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 408 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Miller v. Harvey 408 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Ouachita Equipment Rental Co. v. Trainer 408 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
This factual determination, which was the basis for the trial judge's rejection of appellants' defense of error, must be evaluated *934 based upon a it is clearly wrong, or if it is supported by substantial evidence, and for that reason cannot be disturbed on appeal.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by