Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Norkin v. Joseph 407 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Nash v. La Fontaine 407 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ball v. Ford Motor Co. 407 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 407 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Our duty as an appellate court is to carefully study and review the entire record to determine “that the record establishes that the finding [of fact] is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Arnett v. Trace Development Corp. 407 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Handy v. West 407 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Stephens v. Stephens 407 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Aloise v. Jones 407 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
L & L Sandblasting, Inc. v. American Southern Insurance Co. 407 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Deason v. Mobil Oil Corp. 407 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Cerdes v. Wright 408 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Davis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 409 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Yoder v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets 407 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Walton v. William Wolf Baking Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 168 La. 1981
Soileau v. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. 406 So. 2d 182 La. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Orazio v. Durel 407 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Oliver v. Parish of Jefferson 408 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Ortego v. Lebert 406 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Johnson v. Alexander 406 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Breaux 406 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Baltzar v. Missouri Pac. RR 406 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
McElroy v. Vest 407 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Joseph v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 406 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Spillers v. Cities Service Co. 406 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Cadiere v. West Gibson Products Co., Inc., supra
Guillory v. Inland Life Insurance 406 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coleman v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of North Carolina 407 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Pharis & Pharis v. Rayner 406 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Distinguished Curtis v. Doe 406 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 406 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
First Nat. Bank v. Higgs 406 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene 406 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Williams v. Jones 405 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Williams v. Doyle 405 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Since the record establishes that this finding is not clearly wrong, the judgment is affirmed.
Jenkins v. Dearie 405 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Eads v. Probst 405 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Wolfe v. Jones 405 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Reliable Credit Corp. v. Smith 406 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Belaire v. Vanderbrook 405 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Young v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources 405 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Robillard v. P & R RACETRACKS, INC. 405 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
ifest error, the appellate court is not to disturb the finding of the jury which has evidence before it furnishing a reasonable factual basis for its verdict, based on its reasonable evaluation of credibility; the record does not reveal that the finding is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous
Taunton v. Cane Air, Inc. 405 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. v. STATE FARM, ETC. 405 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Levickey v. Cargill, Inc. 405 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Thompson, supra; (La.App.
Cormier v. Foremost Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
1973); Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
O'NEAL v. Home Ins. Co. 404 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
It is in this context that the opinion of this court may be properly viewed, in effect, as a reversal of the trial court on a question of fact without a concomitant finding of manifest error
Augustine v. COURTNEY CONST. CO., ETC. 405 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Oliver v. Capitano 405 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Batiste v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 404 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Art. 2317 and its progeny, (La.
Gilliam v. Hayes 404 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ellerd v. Williams 404 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981