Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Sentry Ins. v. Marks 398 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
McGee v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BD., ETC. 396 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Horde v. Foucha 396 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
White v. McCool 395 So. 2d 774 La. 1981
Classic Car Imports, Inc. v. Martin 395 So. 2d 1390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Walton v. William Wolf Baking Co. 396 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Bound as we are by the limiting rules of review, we cannot say that the trial court’s finding of permanent and total disability was “clearly wrong.”
Smith v. Town of Logansport 395 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
This case presents a because there was a complete conflict between plaintiffs' expert witnesses and defendants' expert witnesses.
Ewing and Salter, Inc. v. Gafner Automotive & MacHine Inc. 392 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted (La.
Scott v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 392 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Carter v. Poindexter 394 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Frazier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 394 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc. 394 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.”
Roberts v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 394 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Rodriquez v. AMERICAN INTERN. INS. CO. 394 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
[1] in allowing compensation beyond this latter date.
Godwin v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 394 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
DeBlieux v. Arkla Industries, Inc. 390 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Thompson v. Great Midwest Fur Co. 395 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
App. 1st Cir. 1979); rehearing denied 1979.
Delta Southern Co. v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. 394 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Barrow v. Zachary Transmission Service, Inc. 394 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Morris v. Hunter Chemical 394 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Moore v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 395 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
B & L Associates, (La.App.
Price v. Boquet 395 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Shank v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 390 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Parker v. Kroger's, Inc. 394 So. 2d 1178 La. 1981
Davis v. Louisiana Computing Corp. 394 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
1978, ; Canter v. Koehring Co., La.1973, .
In re the Succession of Reed 393 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Del B. Robinson Insurance Agency v. Bill Raney & Mel Wright Paint & Body Shop, Inc. 393 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Weber v. Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc. 393 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Therefore, absent manifest error we affirm the trial court's judgment on the issue of liability.
Flournoy v. Flournoy 392 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Dosch v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 392 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Noel v. Devillier 392 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Waller v. American National Fire Insurance 392 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Palmer v. State 393 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Moss v. Maryland Casualty Co. 392 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc. 392 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
City of Lafayette v. Cason 393 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Robertson v. Travis 393 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
United Bridge Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 393 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Rouprich v. Rouprich 393 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
We have reviewed the record and find no basis upon which to uphold the lower court’s (La.
Anderson v. Moses 393 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Binder v. McGehee 393 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Hammond Motors, Inc. v. Glass 393 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Lewis v. Toledo National Insurance Co. 393 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Dundy v. Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge 394 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Smith v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc. 391 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Thibodeaux v. Schwegmann Bros. Super Market 391 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Penn v. Schwegmann Westside Expressway, Inc. 391 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Manzanares v. AMERICAN INTERN. FOREST PRODUCTS, INC. 389 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Merchant v. Dept. of Finance 391 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
For this reason the usual guidelines for appellate review, i. e., manifest error rule, are not applicable.
Burgett v. Burgett 390 So. 2d 1390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Arceneaux v. Domingue, La., (1978).