Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Thomasson v. AK DURNIN CHRYSLER-PLY., INC. 399 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Thibodeaux v. Southeastern Fire Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
SOUTHERN PLASTICS, ETC. v. Dixie Brewing Co. 399 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Hingle v. Plaquemines Oil Sales Corp. 399 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
the court, in defining the term "manifestly erroneous", stated on page 1333: * * * * * * "As an aid to the exercise of the appellate function of review of facts in civil cases, we attempted to explain, in Canter v. Keohring, supra, without great detail, the appropriate standard.
Morales v. Magnolia Chemicals & Solvents, Inc. 399 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Reece v. Shell Oil Co. 400 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Martinez v. Landry 399 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. v. Boyce Gin Co-Op., Inc. 397 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Provost v. A. E. Gravois & Sons, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The Supreme Court has restricted the intermediate appellate court’s ability to change a trial court’s finding of fact only to instances where the trial court’s finding of fact was “clearly wrong.”
Arceneaux v. Bellow 395 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Leach v. Freeman 395 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Jessie v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 398 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Harris v. Sewerage & Water Board 398 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Hill v. Murco, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Arceneaux v. *1214 Domingue
Insurance Analysis, Inc. v. XPLO Corp. 398 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Laurendine v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Stark v. Town of Merryville 396 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Ingraham v. Insurance Co. of North America 399 So. 2d 213 La. 1981
Neville v. Johnson 398 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Miller v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc. 398 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
McDaniel v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 398 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Heath v. Northgate Mall, Inc. 398 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Rider v. LeCompte 398 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Glasscock v. Glasscock 398 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Nash v. Western Casualty & Surety Co. 398 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
provides that the factual determinations of the trier of fact must not be disturbed unless a review of the trial record indicates that its conclusions are manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
American Motors Insurance Co. v. Leger 398 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
“Manifestly erroneous” in its simplest terms means “clearly wrong.”
Cooper v. Cooper 398 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Security Timber & Land Co. v. Reed 398 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Bordelon v. Safeway Insurance 398 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Clement v. Marion Corp. 398 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Parr v. Vicari 400 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bitterwolf 401 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1st Cir. 1977); ” Unlike determination of the market value of the land, for severance damage purposes the court needs to consider the effects of the completion of the project.
Campbell v. Dolci 400 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ray v. Ameri-Care Hospital 400 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Johnson v. Schwegmann Bros. 397 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Therefore, we are required to accept the factual finding of the trial court to the effect that plaintiff was detained by defendant's employees after all doubt was removed that he had in fact paid for the ice he was suspected of stealing.
Curole v. Ebasco Services, Inc. 397 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Dyna International Corp. v. Mashburn 397 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc. 396 So. 2d 1261 La. 1981
Simoneaux v. Davis 397 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Canty v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury 397 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Mitchell v. Bertolla 397 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Standard Machine & Equipment Co. v. Lake Charles Refining Co. 396 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Randle v. Commercial Union Insurance 396 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-ing Company, as follows: “When there is evidence before the trier of fact, which upon its reasonable evaluation of credibility, furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s finding, on review the appellate court should not disturb this factual finding in the absence of manifest error....” “Manifest error” as follows: "...
Dickson v. State Farm Insurance Agency 396 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Helaire v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 397 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Guidry v. Houston General Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
West v. Belden Corp. 396 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Duncan v. Campbell Soup Co. 396 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Duplessis v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 396 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The trial court’s findings on either are not to be disturbed on appeal if reasonably supported by the record and not clearly wrong, (La.
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. National Molasses Co. 396 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1981