Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Dellandra Brett Todd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Todd 866 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Perrilloux 864 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Taves 861 So. 2d 144 La. 2003
State v. Wilson 859 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
(case remanded to district court to determine whether minimum sentence mandated by Habitual Offender Law was unconstitutionally excessive).
State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Wilturner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State v. Wilturner 858 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,"
State of Louisiana v. Felton Cofield Bey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Berniard 860 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Wilson, 01-2815, pp. 3-4 (La.11/22/02)
State v. Bey 857 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 4/15/98), (), grant of post-conviction relief affirmed, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
State v. Jones 850 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Augillard 853 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Schexnaider 852 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Ballard 848 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. James 849 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Brown 849 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Brown 842 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Smith 842 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Harris 842 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Rasheed 841 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Thomas 841 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Ricks 841 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Graham 845 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Lanieu, 98-1260, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. Robertson 840 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Bingham 838 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Day 838 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State v. Pham 839 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Wix 838 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Smith 839 So. 2d 1 La. 2003
State v. Dangerfield 834 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. *1155 Sepulvado
State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Jefferson 834 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lewis 834 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Wilson 836 So. 2d 2 La. 2002
(case remanded to district court to determine whether minimum sentence mandated by Habitual Offender Law was unconstitutionally excessive).
State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Suire 827 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Rutland 829 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
provides that a sentence which falls within the statutory range may still be excessive, we do not find this sentence excessive.
State v. Hayes 836 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Sullivan 827 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Daggs 823 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.02/25/98), .
State v. Brown 821 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Johnson, supra at 676
State v. Johnson 821 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
it held that the guidelines of La.
State v. Palermo 818 So. 2d 745 La. 2002
615 , 136 L.Ed.2d 539 (1996) (In sentence review, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'"); (For legal sentences imposed within the range provided by the legislature, a trial court abuses *752 its discretion only when it contravenes the prohibition of excessive punishment in La.
State v. Cottrell 817 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Brooks 817 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. James 813 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
decided by a divided court.
State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002