Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

State v. Chandler 939 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Hano 938 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Touchet 931 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Touchet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Washington 931 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Williams 932 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State v. Pitre 924 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit," (La.
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Craig Pitre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State v. Kujawa 929 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Fomond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State v. Fomond 921 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. Clark 918 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
" `[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State of Louisiana v. Donald Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Jarreau 921 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable by this court on appellate review of his conviction.” 367 So.2d at 767 .
State v. Turner 927 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Scott 927 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Dustin K. Runyon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
he contends that his mandatory life sentence for a second-degree murder conviction is too severe and that he should either be resentenced or a more appropriate sentence should be imposed by this court.
State v. Runyon 916 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
he contends that his mandatory life sentence for a second-degree murder conviction is too severe and that he should either be resentenced or a more appropriate sentence should be imposed by this court.
State v. Harris 911 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
738 , (1971), for the proposition that "a sentence imposed by a trial judge that is within statutory limits is generally not subject to review on appeal.” holding that "the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable by this court on appellate review of his conviction.” The supreme court has repeatedly upheld the rule of appellate review of sente
State v. Thibodeaux 915 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Dorsey 907 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Black 907 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Colar 893 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" (quoting State v. *156 Sepulvado, ).
State of Louisiana v. Briant Keith Colar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
"‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’" ().
State of Louisiana v. Neal W. Insley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Insley 893 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Spencer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State v. Spencer 888 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,"
State of Louisiana v. Orlon Peloquin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State v. Peloquin 888 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State of Louisiana v. Lamar Pierce Phillips La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State v. Phillips 887 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,"
State of Louisiana v. Renaldo Gerard Sweet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State v. Sweet 880 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Delano Sutton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State v. Sutton 879 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that "[a] sentence may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit," (La.
State v. Moore 877 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Warren, 28,889 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/96), .
State v. Walton 872 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
However, in State v. Marshall, 81-3115, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State v. Walker 870 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Smith 879 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. August 870 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Robert August La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Landry 871 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Darrell Brent Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State v. Whatley 867 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. Loston 874 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004