DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

  • State v. Watson 484 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Frelix 484 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Boudreaux 484 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dennison 482 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Article I, § 20 of the 1974 Louisiana Constitution; (La.App.
  • State v. Norman 482 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3d Cir.1984), writ *1070 denied, at page 196: “ the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable on appellate review of his conviction.
  • State v. Schmutz 483 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Williams 482 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Morton 483 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fluitt 482 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fluker 482 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State, in Interest of Garner 484 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Trahan 481 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Arvel 481 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Dalcourt 481 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Autin 481 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Gillen 480 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Coolie 483 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    which held that a sentence within statutory limits may nonetheless be excessive
  • State v. Delahoussaye 479 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hartman 479 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    the court held that a sentence can be excessive even if it falls within the statutory limit.
  • State v. Chance 480 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Desselle 479 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. O'Meara 479 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court held that a sentence, although within the statutory limit, could be reviewed for excessiveness.
  • State v. Bridges 480 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2d Cir.1983), writ den., (1983)
  • State v. Buckhalter 480 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thrasher 480 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Green 480 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Barberousse 480 So. 2d 273 La. 1985
  • State v. Browning 475 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Harris 480 So. 2d 281 La. 1985
  • State v. Hogan 480 So. 2d 288 La. 1985
  • State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Robins 479 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Williams 479 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smith 479 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Thomas 479 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Nelson 477 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court held that a sentence may be excessive even though it falls within the statutory limits.
  • State v. Green 478 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    We are mindful of the jurisprudence which establishes that a sentence within the statutory limit may, in certain instances, violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment, but we find no abuse of the sentencing discretion vested in the trial judge.
  • State v. Sam 478 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    cruel, excessive, or unusual punishment.” held that Article I, § 20 created the power of appellate review for excessiveness of sentences although imposed within statutory guidelines.
  • State v. Jones 478 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 7 In this assignment, defendant contends that his sentences were excessive under Art. 1, § 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974
  • State v. Lewis 478 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Tomlin 478 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. King 478 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2d Cir.1983), writ den., (1983)
  • State v. Allen 478 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Murray 476 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Walker 476 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Richard 476 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Cottingin 476 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. White 476 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985