Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Art. 894.1, and that the sentence imposed is excessive under Art. 1, § 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, (La.
State v. Wisham 476 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Johnston 476 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Price 476 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Borning 477 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hanner 476 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Edwards 476 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Wright 476 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Hayes 476 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
2d Cir.1983), writ denied
State v. Denstell 476 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. House 476 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Freeman 474 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Lambert 475 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. LeClear 474 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 474 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
we held that ‘the imposition of a sentence, although within the statutory limit, may violate a defendant’s constitutional rights against excessive punishment that is enforceable by this court on appellate review of his conviction.’ ...
State v. Fuselier 474 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Chance 475 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Minnifield 475 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Martin 475 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Burgess 475 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Coon 475 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Thompson 473 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Telsee [ ], supra
State v. Johnson 474 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Sepulvado 473 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Miller 473 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 473 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Marks 472 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
See: and subsequent similar expressions by the High Court.
State v. King 471 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Guidry 472 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Defendant contends that the trial judge failed to particularize the sentence in accordance with Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 894.1, and also that the sentence imposed is excessive under article I, section *351 20
State v. Lincoln 471 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1979); State v. Sepulvado, [ ], supra.
State v. LaGrange 471 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Perry 472 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
1982); -72 (La.1979); (La.App.
State v. Green 471 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 471 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Bradford 471 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Sheppard 472 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Morgan 472 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hart 472 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Tatum 471 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Collins 470 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Griffin 470 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Henry 470 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Gaines 470 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Miller 470 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Allen 470 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
A sentence may still be considered excessive even if it is within the statutory limits, but we find the sentence is not excessive in this case.
State v. Brisco 470 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Perry 470 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Hawkins 470 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Kinkade 470 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985