Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of Batiste, 367 So. 2d 784.

108 citing documents.

State ex rel. C.D. 69 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. C.N. 69 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste
State Ex Rel. Cn 69 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. L.V. 66 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State in the Interest of H.N., 97-0982 at p. 2, 717 So.2d at 667 (citing State in the Interest of Batiste, ) (mere possession of a bicycle was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt a violation of La.Rev.Stat.
State ex rel. A.H. 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Ah 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State ex rel.
State ex rel. W.H. 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Const. ART. 5, § 5, 10, 18 and 19; see also State in the Interest of Batiste
State Ex Rel. Wh 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
CONST. ART. 5, § 5, 10, 18 and 19; see also State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State Ex Rel. Tc 60 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State in the Interest of S.S., (La.App.
State ex rel. T.C. 60 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
See State in the Interest of Batiste, State in the Interest of S.S., (La.App.
State ex rel. C.J. 60 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State in Interest of Batiste
State Ex Rel. Th 52 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State ex rel. T.H. 52 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State ex rel. D.R. 51 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State in Interest of Batiste, see also State in the Interest of D.R., 10-0405 (La.App.
State ex rel. D.R. 50 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1 r,The Louisiana Supreme Court in State in the Interest of Batiste, specifically decided that Except as otherwise provided by the constitution, this Court’s jurisdiction in civil cases extends to both law and facts; in criminal matters, its criminal jurisdiction extends only to questions of law.
State Ex Rel. Km 49 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
See State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State in the Interest of S.C. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Const. Art. V, § 10(B) (1974); State In Interest of Batiste
State Ex Rel. Scj 28 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Const. Art. V, § 10(B) (1974); State In Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. S.C.J. 28 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const. Art. V, § 10(B) (1974); State In Interest of Batiste
State Ex Rel. Tt 30 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Const. Art. V, § 10(B); State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. T.T. 30 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const. Art. V, § 10(B); State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. A.J. 27 So. 3d 247 La. 2009
Causey, 363 So.2d at 474 ; See [In re] Banks, [(La.1981)]
In Re State Ex Rel. AJ 27 So. 3d 247 La. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Eric Harrison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In State in the Interest of Batiste, a case wherein a juvenile was charged with theft but convicted of unauthorized use of a movable, the supreme court held that the state must prove that the defendant took the item.
State v. Dunbar 950 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir.1990) and State in Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. D.J. 817 So. 2d 26 La. 2002
s are entitled to due process in delinquency proceedings; specifically, right to advance notice of charges, a fair and impartial hearing, the right to counsel, right to confront and cross-examine witnesses and protection against self-incrimination); see also State in the Interest of Banks, (juveniles are entitled to pre-adjudication bail); State in the Interest of Batiste, (a child in juvenile proceedings is entitled to adequate written notice of the' charge and of the factual allegations upon w
State Ex Rel. Dj 817 So. 2d 26 La. 2002
s are entitled to due process in delinquency proceedings; specifically, right to advance notice of charges, a fair and impartial hearing, the right to counsel, right to confront and cross-examine witnesses and protection against self-incrimination); see also State in the Interest of Banks, (juveniles are entitled to pre-adjudication bail); State in the Interest of Batiste, (a child in juvenile proceedings is entitled to adequate written notice of the charge and of the factual allegations upon wh
State ex rel. J.S. 808 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
art. V, § 10B; See State in the Interest of Batiste, In the Interest of L.C., 96-2511 (La.App.
State ex rel. J.M. 742 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Const. Art. V, § 10(B) (1974); State In Interest of Batiste
State v. R.W. 721 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State in Interest of Batiste, State in Interest of C.D., 95-160 (La.App.
State, in Interest of Hn 717 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State in the Interest of Batiste
In Re CB 708 So. 2d 391 La. 1998
Causey, 363 So.2d at 474 ; See Banks, supra, ; In re Batiste, *398
In re C.B. 708 So. 2d 391 La. 1998
Causey, 363 So.2d at 474 ; See Banks, supra, ; In re Batiste, *398
In Interest of Lc 696 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. S.T. 677 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste
State in Interest of AH 670 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
V, § 10(B) (1974); State In Interest of Batiste, State In Interest of Wilkerson, (La.App.
State in Interest of JL, Jr. 592 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Const. Art. V, § 10(B) (1974); State in Interest of Batiste, (La.
State in Interest of OB 559 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State in the Interest of Batiste
State in Interest of Handy 559 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
14:5, State in the Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. Newton 559 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1 In State in Interest of Batiste, the Court stated: Because a juvenile who is alleged to have committed a serious crime is confronted with consequences not essentially different from those faced by adult criminal defendants ...
State ex rel. C.W. 541 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In Interest of Rodrigues 532 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
It cited State in Interest of Batiste, as authority for the proposition that the Code of Criminal Procedure is indirectly applicable to juvenile proceedings.
State v. Ainsworth 528 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State in Interest of Rowland 509 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Also, State in the Interest of Batiste, cited by the defendant for the proposition that the state must both prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the child has committed a crime and that the child is in need of care or rehabilitation in order for a child to be adjudged delinquent, does not assist the defendant.
State v. Bass 509 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Young 469 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State in Interest of Batiste, aff'd
State, in Interest of Racine 433 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste
State v. Jones 426 So. 2d 1323 La. 1983
State in Interest of Batiste, (La.
State in Interest of Pigott 413 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
It cited State in Interest of Batiste, as authority for the proposition that the Code of Criminal Procedure is indirectly applicable to juvenile proceedings.
State in Interest of Hickerson 411 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
However, under the holding of the Louisiana Supreme Court in State in the Interest of Batiste, a child may be adjudged a delinquent based on a finding that the child committed a lesser offense included within the crime alleged in the petition.