Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of Batiste, 367 So. 2d 784.

108 citing documents.

State in Interest of Aaron 405 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
See State in Interest of Batiste, (La.
State, in Interest of Thomas 395 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Article 5, Section 10, Louisiana Constitution of 1974; State in Interest of Batiste
State, in Interest of Giangrosso 395 So. 2d 709 La. 1981
The court of appeal affirmed, rejecting defendants' various complaints about the conduct of the adjudication hearing and finding that the evidence was sufficient to support the adjudication under State in the Interest of Baptiste, (La.
State ex rel. of Korkosz 393 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
State In Interest of Batiste
State in Interest of Lewis 386 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1978), affirmed
State v. Booker 385 So. 2d 1186 La. 1980
See In the Interest of Batiste
State in Interest of Giangrosso 385 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Article 5, Section 10, Constitution of 1974; see State in Interest of Batiste
State ex rel. Gibson 382 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
en the penis and the vulva, the penis and the anus, the mouth or tongue and the penis, or the mouth or tongue and the vulva.” Since there are no procedures provided in the Code of Juvenile Procedure for the rendering of responsive verdicts against juveniles, we must look to the Code of Criminal Procedure which is indirectly applicable to juvenile proceedings (See State in the Interest of Batiste, at page 786) in order to determine if the verdict of guilty of attempted sexual battery is responsiv