Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Niemann v. Travelers Ins. Co., 368 So. 2d 1003.

58 citing documents.

Hieu Phuong Hoang v. Thornton Services, Inc. 192 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Roy Weldon v. Monica Curry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Weldon v. Curry 899 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Becnel v. Stein 726 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Co., Rizer v. American Sur.
Trautman v. Poor 685 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Rizer v. American Sur. & Fid. Ins. Co. 669 So. 2d 387 La. 1996
Egros v. Pempton 606 So. 2d 780 La. 1992
Galliano v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. 606 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Co., Sharp v. Daigre, supra; (La.
Morrison v. Gonzalez 602 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Malbrough v. Wallace 594 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Egros v. Pempton 588 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Co., -1008 (La.1979), wherein the Supreme Court stated that the UM carrier has no right under La.R.S.
American States Ins. Co. v. Roark 583 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Co., at pp. 1007, 1008 (La.1979).
Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turner 582 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Hubert v. Martin 572 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Sharp v. Daigre 564 So. 2d 303 La. 1990
Sharp v. Daigre 555 So. 2d 1361 La. 1990
Co., Block v. Reliance Ins.
Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Morvant v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. 538 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Co., Whitten v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins.
Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co. 536 So. 2d 417 La. 1988
Bauer v. White 532 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Bosch v. Cummings 520 So. 2d 721 La. 1988
Edmonds v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 508 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
See also Niemann v. Travelers Ins., Co.
Moreland v. Green 501 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
3d Cir.1985), 4 Aubry et Rau, Cours de Droit Civil Francais, no. 321 (6th ed. 1946).
Smith v. Ly 498 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Aucoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 499 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Co., supra [ ]; Whitten v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins.
Moncrief v. Panepinto 489 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Co., (4th Cir.1981); Bourgeois v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., (4th Cir.1980); (4th Cir.1985), and a line of cases holding that where an insured released a third party *940 tortfeasor the subrogation rights of his insurer are de
Comeaux v. Roy 469 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Co., 4 Aubry et Rau, Cours de Droit Civil Francais, no. 321 (6th ed. 1946).
Jordan v. Sweeney 467 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Jilek v. Covert 465 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Co., Pace v. Cage , above.
Fertitta v. Allstate Ins. Co. 462 So. 2d 159 La. 1985
Co., provides something less than subrogation for the uninsured motorist carrier who pays part of the tort victim's damages caused by the tortfeasor and accordingly that Section 1406D(4) overrides the provisions of La.C.C.
Carona v. State Farm Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 1275 La. 1984
Bundy v. Toups 454 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Some three years before its decision in Hoefly
Boudreaux v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 454 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Some three years before its decision in Hoefly
Wheelahan v. Eller 446 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Co., and that the tortfeasor's (but not the UM carrier's) liability is lessened by the tortfeasor's inability to pay, Bond v. Commercial Union Assur.
Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 1040 La. 1983
Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 425 So. 2d 224 La. 1983
Co., Whitten v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins.
Chiasson v. Whitney 427 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 418 So. 2d 575 La. 1982
Elledge v. Warren, 263 * (La.App.
White v. Patterson 409 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the Supreme Court thoroughly discussed the provisions of LSA-R.S.
Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 407 So. 2d 401 La. 1981
Oliver v. Capitano 405 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
1979, , rules: On the basis alone of statutory interpretation, we find that the UM insurer has no right under R.S.
Suhor v. Gusse 403 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
1979, ), we are obliged to render judgment over in favor of State Farm against the Bellows for the amount of the judgment against State Farm.
Abraham v. Naul 402 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Singleton v. Kindler 399 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Co., the Supreme Court was faced with the issue of “whether a ‘consent to settle clause’ in an UM policy is valid and operative, and whether a plaintiff, who without his UM carrier’s consent settles and releases an unde-rinsured tortfeasor and that tortfeasor’s liability insurance carrier, has defeated his cause
Ewing v. Sanson 394 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Lute v. City of Lake Charles 394 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Thibodeaux v. Olivier 394 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Pace v. Cage 394 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Courville v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 386 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980