Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Niemann v. Travelers Ins. Co., 368 So. 2d 1003.

58 citing documents.

Pons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 387 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Hawthorne v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. 387 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Hebert v. Ordoyne 388 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
However, does not allow Royal Globe subrogation rights in the present case where plaintiffs have previously settled with a tortfeasor.
Lege v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 386 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Before the second trial, which invalidated the “consent to settle clause” of the uninsured motorist policy.
McGrew v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 385 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
the Supreme Court stated: "On the basis alone of statutory interpretation, we find that the UM insurer has no right under R.S.
Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Companies 387 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Bourgeois v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 385 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Co., the Supreme Court, in holding illegal subrogation and consent-to-settle clauses of a UM policy, *587 stated that because the UM statute neither implicitly nor explicitly sanctioned the clauses, and the clauses served to block the statutorily mandated UM coverage, those clauses were without binding effect.
LeBoeuf v. Dupre 378 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
First, held that the law does not provide the UM carrier a right of subrogation.