Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lassai, 366 So. 2d 1389.
- State v. Rochelle 877 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Maise 805 So. 2d 1141 La. 2002
-
State v. Moore
719 So. 2d 59
La. 1998
art. 900; Sussmann, 374 So.2d at 1259 ; State ex rel.
-
State v. Black
706 So. 2d 423
La. 1997
1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), applies only if bad faith shown); , 1073 n. 13 (La.1979) (not every *425 probationer facing revocation is "entitled to compulsory process in order to have live witnesses present at the hearing"); ("the Miranda [ v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct.
- State v. Williams 614 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Hall 487 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Edwards 440 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Sonnier
437 So. 2d 987
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
United States v. Johnson, 455 F.2d 932 (5th Cir. 1972), cert.
- State v. Wagner 410 So. 2d 1089 La. 1982
-
State v. Malone
403 So. 2d 1234
La. 1981
we held that a defendant's admissions to his probation officer were properly admitted in spite of the absence of Miranda warning.
-
State v. Spell
399 So. 2d 551
La. 1981
the court rejected the contention that a communication given by the defendant to a counselor at a drug abuse center was privileged under LSA-R.S.
- State v. Duncan 396 So. 2d 297 La. 1981
- State v. Rideau 376 So. 2d 1251 La. 1979
- State v. Davis 375 So. 2d 69 La. 1979
- State v. Jenkins 375 So. 2d 957 La. 1979
- State v. Sussmann 374 So. 2d 1256 La. 1979