Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., 369 So. 2d 1043.

71 citing documents.

Ja'Quarrius Ignont v. Rick Breen DBA Breen's Rapid Lube La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
2d 389 (1957); Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
Genevieve Moore v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College O/B/O Lsu Health … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
1989) (citing Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
Samuel F. Patterson, III v. Darryl W. Peterson, MD and Lammico Insurance Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
2d 36, 42, quoting Walker v. Union Mill, Inc., ( La.
Show & Tell of New Orleans, L.L.C. v. Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 171 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
It does not apply “if there is sufficient direct evidence explaining the occurrence and establishing the details of the negligence charged.” Id., 06-3030, p. 7, 966 So.2d at 42 (quoting Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., ).
Justiss Oil Co. v. Monroe Air Center, L.L.C. 46 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Jane Doe v. Scott M. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
(quoting Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Doe v. Hawkins 42 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(quoting Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., ).
Linnear v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX/RELIANT 966 So. 2d 36 La. 2007
544 , (1957); see also Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
Comeaux v. LAFAYETTE GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER 944 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., 262 La.
Deedra Comeaux v. Lafayette General Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Application of the principle is defeated if an inference that the accident was due to a cause other than defendant’s negligence could be drawn as reasonably as one that it was due to his negligence.” Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., 262 La.
Salvant v. State 935 So. 2d 646 La. 2006
"The doctrine applies only when the facts of the controversy `suggest negligence of the defendant, rather than some other factor, as the most plausible explanation of the accident.'" (citing Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., 262 La.
Sheralon F. Moore v. Pitt Grill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., n.2 (La.1979).
Moore v. Pitt Grill 871 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., , 1045 n. 2 (La.1979).
Lillian E. Landaiche Roy v. Sheriff Bill Belt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See Walker v. Union Mill Oil, Inc.
Roy v. Belt 868 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Jefferson v. Cooper/T. Smith Corp. 858 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
1989); Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc., and Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. 853 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Hill v. Tabor, 542 * Harris, 455 So.2d at 1369 ; Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Black v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 783 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., the Supreme Court delineated the general duty of a property owner.
Turner v. Parish of Jefferson Through Dept. of Recreation 721 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
In Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., the court discussed the burden of proof required in order to establish owner liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316: In determining an owner's liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316 the test had been stated to be whether in the management of his property he had acted as a reasonable ma
Ludwig v. Jefferson Performing Arts Society 714 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc., Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Boycher v. Livingston Parish School Board 716 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Deumite v. State 692 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1st Cir.1986), writ granted, (dismissed because of compromise), citing Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Picou v. Equifax Services, Inc. 690 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Application of the principle is defeated if an inference that the accident was due to a cause other than defendant’s negligence could be drawn as reasonably as one that it was due to his negligence.” Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., 262 La.
Delaune v. Medical Ctr. of Baton Rouge 683 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
In Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., the supreme court observed the following: In determining a particular defendant's duty consideration should be given to the nature of the facility and the dangers presented by it.
Fletcher v. Fenoli 674 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Robinson v. Yousuf 668 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Harris, 455 So.2d at 1369 ; Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Thompson v. Louisiana Dept. of Transp. 639 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
writ denied, (citing Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc. (La.
Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 638 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Harris, 455 So.2d at 1369 ; Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., ...
Hodge v. Liquid Ventures 634 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Harris, 455 So.2d at 1369 ; Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Broussard v. CNA Insurance Co. 628 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
The Louisiana Supreme Court interpreted Shelton in Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., to state: “In determining an owner’s liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316 the test has been stated to be whether in the management of his property he has acted as a reasonable man in view of the probability of injury to others.
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res. 620 So. 2d 811 La. 1993
Harris, 455 So.2d at 1369 ; Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Katsanis v. State Farm General Ins. Co. 615 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, supra; Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Lexington Insurance Co. v. Rheem/Ruud Manufacturing Co. 610 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., White .v. CF Industries, Inc., (La.
Glankler v. Rapides Parish School Bd. 610 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Massey ex rel. Massey v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 557 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., at 1047 , (La.1979), the court discussed the burden of proof required in order to establish owner liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316: In determining an owner’s liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316 the test had been stated to be whether in the management of his property he had acted as a rea
Morris v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 553 So. 2d 427 La. 1989
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Fox v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MED. CTR. 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Boudreaux, [supra].
Fox v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center 550 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Application of the principle is defeated if an inference that the accident was due to a cause other than the defendant’s negligence could be drawn as reasonably as one that it was due to his negligence.” Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Boudreaux, [supra].
St. Hill v. Tabor 542 So. 2d 499 La. 1989
The duty of a property owner was delineated by this court in Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., : In determining an owner's liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316 the test has been stated to be whether in the management of his property he has acted as a reasonable man in view of the probability of injury to others.
Montgomery v. Opelousas General Hosp. 540 So. 2d 312 La. 1989
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., 262 La.
St. Hill v. Tabor 532 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
However, in Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., our Supreme Court clearly enunciated the duties and responsibilities of a property owner to others in the management of his property: In determining an owner's liability under Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316 the test has been stated to be whether in the management of his property he has acted as a reasona
Montgomery v. Opelousas General Hosp. 529 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Martin v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. 531 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Mergen v. Piper Aircraft Corp. 524 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Beslin v. Charity Hospital of New Orleans 521 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Johnson v. Acadiana Medical Center, Inc. 524 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., stated at page 1047 that: “ ‘The owner and operator of a facility has the duty of exercising reasonable care for the safety of persons on his premises and the duty of not exposing such persons to unreasonable risks of injury or harm.
Rebennack v. LeBlanc 519 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
That duty was further defined in Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Spurlock v. Cosmair, Inc. 509 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc., (La.
Van Pelt v. Morgan City Power Boat Ass'n, Inc. 489 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.
Blanchard v. Riley Stoker Corp. 492 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Walker v. Union Oil Mill, Inc.