Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cox, 369 So. 2d 118.

220 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Alphonso Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Dewey Glenn Burnworth, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Ephraim Wilson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Cassetti Dewayne Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Kenny Roy Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93–3101 (La.3/18/94), (citing 10 ).
State v. Young 270 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Steven Blunt AKA Steven L. Blunt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Blunt 201 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Urena 215 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-3101 (La.3/18/94), ( ).
State v. Williams 129 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
However, in Messer , the Court merely noted that, “[a]s a general rule, the imposition of consecutive rather than concurrent sentences for crimes arising from a single course of conduct requires particular justification.” 408 So.2d at 1357 , (imposition of consecutive sentences requires particular justification), (trial court did not specify reasons for issuing consecutive sentences).
State v. Colvin 65 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Gene Mitchell Olivier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Merritt, 03-946 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Robin Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Demarco D. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Hawkins 956 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Scott 952 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Karl Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Thibodeaux 924 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Dillon James Merritt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Merritt 875 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 679 La. 1998
Only a few months later, we addressed the procedural requirements necessary for appellate review of a sentence as excessive.
State v. Behrnes 706 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Barker 628 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
§ 215, Author's Commentary (2)
State v. Brown 627 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Bennett 623 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Conway 588 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Hughes 587 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Ventress 578 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Thereafter, the defendant must be afforded an opportunity to make a showing, by argument of counsel or otherwise, of statutory mitigating factors which the trial court may have overlooked in imposing sentence, (La.
State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Brass 563 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Bland 558 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Gaines 557 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Mallett 552 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Segura 546 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Delaneuville 545 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Guillory 544 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Barrett 544 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Chavis 542 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Sanders 542 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Phillips 542 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Sloan 542 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Sepulvado, supra
State v. Maddox 542 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Sepulvado, supra.
State v. Bell 543 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Sepulvado, supra .
State v. Volkmann 539 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Sepulvado, supra