Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Credeur v. Luke, 368 So. 2d 1030.

45 citing documents.

Distinguished Brian Savoie, Kendrick Savoie and Kevin Savoie, Individually and on Behalf of the Decedent, Willie Savoie v. Anco … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Furthermore, contrary to plaintiffs' argument on appeal, - 32 La.
Judith Langlinais Mistich v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 1965)]; [;] and Rodriguez v. Northwestern National Ins.
Mistich v. Weeks 107 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2 Cir.1965) ]; [;] and Rodriguez v. Northwestern National Ins.
Domingue v. Rodrigue 686 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The Seals court in so holding, (La.
McCarthy v. Berman 668 So. 2d 721 La. 1996
McCarthy v. Berman 656 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Kantack v. Progressive Ins. Co. 618 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Armstrong v. Hanover Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Sweeney v. City of Shreveport 584 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Shaw v. Fidelity & Cas. Ins. Co. 582 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Schroeder v. BOARD OF SUP'RS 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
La.Civ.Code art. 2049; Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
La.Civ.Code art. 2049; Albritton v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 579 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Barnes v. Thames 578 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Sam v. Delta Downs, Inc. 564 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Nickels v. Guarantee Trust Life Ins. Co. 563 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Benton v. Long Mfg. NC, Inc. 550 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Insurance Company of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc., 70th Street Food Store, (La.App.
Jarreau v. Louisiana Stallions 546 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Insurance Company of North America v. [Solari] Parking, Inc., Creduer v. Larke [Luke], Glass Services Unlimited v. Modular Quarters, Inc., (La.App.
Rosinia v. Board of Trustees 526 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Clark v. Harris 522 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
See, e.g., Insurance Co. of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc., Heiman v. Pan American Life Ins.
Tunks v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 520 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hemphill 510 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Barras v. Benoit 509 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Co., Benton Casing Service
Westerfield v. LaFleur 493 So. 2d 600 La. 1986
Smith, supra; Hendricks, supra
Cell-O-Mar, Inc. v. Gros 479 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Carter v. Deitz 478 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
When the ambiguity relates to a provision which limits liability under the policy, the law requires that the contract be interpreted liberally in favor of coverage.”
Pomares v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 474 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Guillory v. Morein 468 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Nida v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 454 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Co., Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco, Ins.
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. 454 So. 2d 1081 La. 1984
Insurance Company of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc.
Lacoste v. Price 453 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Pique v. Saia 450 So. 2d 654 La. 1984
Co., Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco, Ins.
Fontana v. Zurich Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Boudreaux v. Verret 422 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Appellants also contend, that the policy is ambiguous inasmuch as Par Industries and Verret are named insured in certain provisions of the policies, yet they are excluded from coverage in other provisions.
Blue Ridge Insurance v. Newman 423 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Insurance Company of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc., 70th Street Food Store, (La.App.
Seals v. Morris 423 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Distinguished Richard v. Hebert's Creamery, Inc. 415 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The present situation is distinguishable from the case relied upon by appellant, where the president of the corporation was individually named in the policy as an insured.
Scott v. Glenn 408 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
See, e.g., Insurance Co. of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc., *1170 Heiman v. Pan American Life Ins.
70th St. Food Store, Inc. v. NORTHEASTERN FIRE INS. CO. 408 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 407 So. 2d 401 La. 1981
See, e. g., Insurance Co. of North America v. Solari Parking, Inc., Heiman v. Pan American Life Ins.
Doty v. Safeco Ins. Co. 400 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Franklin v. JA Jones Const. Co. 391 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Additionally, is applicable to the present situation.
Lucas v. Deville 385 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1978) reversed [2] (La.App.
McGuire v. Smith 370 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Credeur v. Luke, et al., (1979).
Kelley v. M AND M DODGE, INC. 370 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
In the recent case of Credeur v. Luke, et al., , rendered March 5, 1979, the Supreme Court held that if the executive officer is the named insured, the cross-employee exclusion does not apply as the executive officer is not an employer of Alton Credeur and such executive officer could not be exposed to a workmen's compensation obligation.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by