Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of Cal., 368 So. 2d 1032.

31 citing documents.

Nucor Steel Louisiana, LLC Versus St. James Parish School Board and Neshelle Nogess in Her Capacity as Tax … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Dean v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 975 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Talbert v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CAS. IN. CO. 971 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Willis v. SAFEWAY INS. CO. OF LOUISIANA 968 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
West v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 954 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
In articulating the standard of proof for determining whether an insured has the intent to deceive, adopted the following language from the first circuit's opinion in Watson v. Life Ins.
Estate of Jeramy Lee Dauzat, Through Its Administratrix, Christine Faye Aymond Dauzat v. Eagle American Life Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Estate of Dauzat v. EAGLE AMERICAN INS. CO. 941 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The standard of proof for determining whether an insured has the intent to deceive was articulated by the supreme *169 (La.App.
Deutschmann v. Rosiere 844 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. v. McCollough 621 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1 Cir.1976), as follows: “Strict proof of fraud is not required to show the applicant’s intent to deceive, because of the inherent difficulties of proving one’s intent.
Lindsey v. Colonial Lloyd's Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 606 La. 1992
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Bertucci 593 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Hayes v. Orleans Parish School Board, 256 La.
LA. ST. BD. OF MED. EXAM. v. Bertucci 593 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Hayes v. Orleans Parish School Board, 256 La.
Kanter v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 587 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Kanter v. LOUISIANA FARM BUR. MUT. INS. 587 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Sigari v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERV. & INDEM. 580 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Benton v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 550 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Coleman v. Occidental Life Insurance Company of North Carolina, supra
GUARANTY BANK & TR. CO. v. Ideal Mut. Ins. Co. 526 So. 2d 1094 La. 1988
Viada v. Blue Cross of Louisiana 524 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Co. of Cal., Jones v. United Sav.
Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Ideal Mutual Insurance Co. 517 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bischoff v. Old Southern Life Ins. Co. 502 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
the Supreme Court enunciated the burden of proof under La.R.S.
Jones v. United Sav. Life Ins. Co. 486 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Co. of Cal., Kieffer v. Southern United Life Ins.
Jefferson Marine Towing, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London 472 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Co. of California, The burden of proof is on the insurer.
Green v. Pilot Life Ins. Co. 450 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Morris v. Southern Life & Health Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Co. of Cal., Coleman v. Occidental Life Ins.
Rozas v. La. Hospital Service, Inc. 413 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Although a literal reading of the decision in Spain seems to lend support to appellant's argument, indicated clearly that a rider, to be effective, need not necessarily be physically attached to the policy through staples, glue, paper clips or the like but rather the intent of the statutes (LSA-R.S.
Little Giant Food Stores, Inc. v. STATE, ETC. 416 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Co. of Cal., Smith v. Town of Vinton, 209 La.
Coleman v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of North Carolina 407 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Topps v. Universal Life Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Ewing v. Sanson 394 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Ryan v. Security Indus. Ins. Co. 386 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
LeBoyd v. Louisiana Transit Co. 375 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979