Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bagley, 378 So. 2d 1356.

27 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    -58 (La.1979), the supreme court discussed the state’s ability to cross-examine a defendant’s character witness and solicit evidence of the defendant’s bad character: Evidence of a defendant’s good character is always admissible to show that it is unlikely he committed the crime with which h
  • State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Thompson 111 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Galliano 945 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Guss 775 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Myers 773 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
    ("The purpose of such inquiries is to expose the witnesses' possible lack of knowledge regarding the character of the defendant, or the witnesses' standard of evaluation.") Except for cases in which character is an essential element of the offense, La.C.E.
  • State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Lewis 578 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Ward 542 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Troquille 493 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    the court stated: Evidence of a defendant’s good character is always admissible to show that it is unlikely he committed the crime with which he is charged.
  • State v. Johnson 492 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    *148 the Court stated: When a defendant chooses to place his character at issue by introducing evidence of his good character, the State is permitted to rebut such evidence either by calling witnesses to testify to the bad character of the defendant, or by impeaching the defense witnesses’ ability to testif
  • State v. Bahm 490 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Singletary 461 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Woods 444 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Rault 445 So. 2d 1203 La. 1984
  • State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
    The Court in Telsee noted the following cases: [2] (1) (La.
  • State v. Paul 439 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Clayton 427 So. 2d 827 La. 1983
  • State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
  • State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
  • State v. Bryan 398 So. 2d 1019 La. 1981
  • State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981