Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

In Re Medical Review Panel Bilello 621 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Talamo v. Shad 619 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
LaBauve v. State 618 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Sudduth v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Development 619 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Provost v. Provost 617 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Martino v. Sunrall 619 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
LaCombe v. Dr. Walter Olin Moss Reg. Hosp. 617 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Deville v. Budd Const. Co. 617 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Foster v. Town of Mamou 616 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Brumfield v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 616 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
outlined the standard for appellate review of damage awards.
Boothe v. State Farm 616 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Bergeron v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 617 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 616 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Taylor v. State 617 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Young v. Armadores De Cabotaje, SA 617 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Cay v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 614 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Gianfala v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 615 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Hernandez v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CAS. INS. CO. 615 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Gonzalez v. Allstate Insurance 615 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 615 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 614 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Paul Insurance Company, (La.
Graham v. Edwards 614 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Jordan v. Intercontinental Bulktank Corp. 621 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Ordinarily, trial court findings of fact are reviewed on appeal under the manifest error (clearly wrong) standard [ ] and trial court quantum awards are reviewed on appeal under the abuse of discretion standard [ ].
Jenkins v. Kerr-McGee Corp. 613 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Austin v. Pascarelli 612 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Pritchett v. Martin 612 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Morton v. Ray 611 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Touchard v. Williams 606 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Hanewinckel v. ST. PAUL'S PROP. & LIABILITY INSURANCE, CO. 611 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Further, "[i]t is only after articulated analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of discretion, that the award may on appellate review, for articulated reason, be considered either excessive or insufficient", (citations omitted).
Borgos v. Buras 611 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Cage v. Caruso 611 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Budget Rent-A-Car v. Gradnigo 611 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Vascocu v. Acme Cement Products, Inc. 610 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
we look first to the record and the individual circumstances of the case to determine if an award was warranted.
Jackson v. AL & W. MOORE TRUCKING 609 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bolton v. Nagalla 609 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Glankler v. Rapides Parish School Bd. 610 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Even though we find that the trial court's damage award of $500,000, the statutory cap, is on the high side, and its progeny, we cannot state that it constitutes an abuse of discretion.
Bergeron v. Southeastern Louisiana University 610 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Perniciaro v. Brinch, supra
Lougon v. Era Aviation, Inc. 609 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
we look first to the individual circumstances of this case.
Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc. 609 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Industries, supra ; Harris v. Doucette, supra .
Cradeur v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 607 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Cradeur v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 607 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Nguyen v. Pausina 607 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Benoit v. Capitol Manufacturing Co. 606 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Berthelot v. Leday 606 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Roy v. Gupta 606 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Nunez v. Wainoco Oil and Gas Co. 606 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Dominici v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 606 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Brimer v. Copeland 604 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Epps v. City of Baton Rouge 604 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by