Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

Williams v. JEFFERSON PARISH HOSP. SERV. DIST. 604 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Appellate review of damage awards is initially limited to the question of whether the trial court's award is a clear abuse of the trier of fact's much discretion
Carey v. Thomas 603 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
In reviewing damage awards made by lower courts, our first inquiry is whether, on the facts of the case, the trier of fact abused its "much discretion" in fixing the award
Williams v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District 2 604 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Appellate review of damage awards is initially limited to the question of whether the trial court’s award is a clear abuse of the trier of fact’s much discretion
Boudreaux v. Farmer 604 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
The standard usually used for appellate review of a as follows: Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual circumstances of the present case.
Washington v. Bellard 602 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Brown v. Department of Transp. 604 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed an appellate court's reduction of a trial court's awards for pain and suffering.
Price v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 608 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Reichert v. Barbera 601 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Upon examining the individual aspects of this injury and its singular effects upon the plaintiff in this case, that the trial judge clearly abused his discretion in the amount awarded.
Price v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 608 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Buccola v. Marchese 599 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Rivet v. LeBlanc 600 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Benoit v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. 602 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
we find the award of damages to be appropriate.
McConnell v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 600 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Miller v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 601 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
O'BRIEN v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 601 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Sharkey v. Sterling Drug, Inc. 600 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Smith v. Lewis 597 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Stoutes v. GMAC 598 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Murphy v. KD Auger Trucking, Inc. 598 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Housley v. Cerise 597 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “before the trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual circumstances of the present case.” If an analysis of the facts discloses an abuse of the trier of fact’s discre
Page v. Gilbert 598 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Buras v. United Gas Pipeline Co. 598 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Scamardo v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co. 595 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
Mitchell v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 596 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Mitchell v. STATE, THROUGH DOTD 596 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Pitre v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 596 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
James v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 597 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 594 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc., (La.App.
Glynn v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 597 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Samuels v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 594 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
Turcich v. Baker 594 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Ellis v. Dover Elevator Co. 597 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Boulmay v. Dubois 593 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
the appellate court [under the guidelines of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ] must award the lowest amount that the jury reasonably could have determined in its discretion."
Wilson v. US Fire and Cas. Co. 593 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Trusclair v. Brown Eagle Ice Co. 594 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Buteau v. Leleux 591 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Verneuil v. Poirier 589 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Glasper v. Henry 589 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 590 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc. 590 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Thomas v. Petrolane Gas Service Ltd. 588 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Coco v. Winston Ind., Inc., (La.
Allen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 589 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Palmer v. Goudchaux/Maison Blanche 588 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
the court ruled that on review of damage award the initial inquiry must always be directed at whether the *744 award for the particular injuries and their effect upon the particular person is a clear abuse of the trier of fact's much discretion.
Hood v. State Through DOTD 587 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Hoffman v. Travelers Ins. Co. 587 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Austin v. St. Charles General Hosp. 587 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Eddy v. Litton 586 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Bernard v. Royal Ins. Co. 586 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991