Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

Brown v. DSI Transports, Inc. 496 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hampton v. State 496 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Harrigan v. Freeman 498 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Freeman v. Harold Dickey Transport, Inc., (La.App.
Johnson v. Beavers 496 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
our Supreme Court emphasized that a reviewing court may not question a trial court award as inadequate or excessive without looking first at the individual circumstances of the case.
Schneider v. Sears Roebuck and Co. 496 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Aucoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 499 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Lemoine v. Insurance Co. of North America 499 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
See Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Saucier v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 499 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
art. 2324.1, the assessment of damages in cases of quasi offenses is left to the much discretion of the jury.
Chatelain v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. 495 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Olivier v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 499 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Bonner v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra ; Winterrowd v. Travelers Indemnity Company, supra ; (La.App.
Bordelon v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 494 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Collins v. Natchitoches Parish Hosp. 493 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Blue v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 493 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
McGillivray v. Rapides Iberia Management Ent. 493 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Hebert v. First Guar. Bank 493 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Tindall v. Kampen 492 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Mercer v. Fruehauf Corp. 492 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
is commenced by an independent evaluation of whether the award was excessive in relation to the facts of the case.
Bivalacqua v. Aube 493 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investment, Inc., (La.App.
Keith v. Bearden 488 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Labauve v. Central Mut. Ins. Co. 491 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
The standard of review for determining whether a general damage award is excessive was set down in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Jason v. Safeco Insurance Companies 490 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
we conclude that the highest award for general damages to which the plaintiff would be entitled is $4,000.00.
Marcel v. La. State Dept. of Public Health 492 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Smith v. Porche Bros. Lumber and Supply, Inc. 491 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
Day v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc. 492 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra .
Frey v. Alfred 492 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Ensminger v. McCormick 489 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Trosclair v. Terrebonne Parish School Bd. 489 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In Efferson , moreover, this court held that an appellate court should raise or lower percentages of fault to the lowest or highest degree of fault that a reasonable trier of fact could have found.
Eaglin v. State Farm Insurance Co. 489 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Honn v. Hartman 489 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Barnett v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 489 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
The initial inquiry in determining whether an award of damages is inadequate or excessive must always be directed to whether the trial court's award for particular injuries and their effects upon the injured person was a clear abuse of the trier of fact's "much discretion"
Sonnier v. Aetna Life & Casualty 488 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
” Arteck Services v. Crownpoint Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Johnson v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. 488 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Schiro v. Travelers Ins. Co. 489 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Perniciaro v. Brinch, supra
Labit v. Setiff 489 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
[A]s the initial inquiry must always be directed at whether the trier's award for the particular injuries and their effects upon this particular injured person is a clear abuse of the trier of fact's much discretion."
Boudreaux v. Murray 489 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The Supreme Court, cautioned: Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual *953 circumstances of the present case.
Fitzgerald v. Gulf Intern. Cinema Corp. 489 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Garrett v. Celino 489 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Riley v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 489 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
we note the following: Medical expenses incurred to date of trial were stipulated to be $19,138.00 and loss of earnings from termination of employment on September 2, 1983 to the date of trial was either $24,443.00 (under the plaintiff's expert's computation) or $18,660.00 (under the defendant's expert's co
Picou v. Ferrara 488 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
we raise the award to the lowest point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded the jury by adding $100,000.00 to the award, making the total award $383,-500.00.
Prothro v. Dillahunty 488 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Hughes v. Querbes & Nelson, Inc., (La.App.
Ortigo v. Merritt 488 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
*1061 (La.1979); Cutchall v. Great American Pump Co., supra.
Myers v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 483 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Swann v. City-Parish 492 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Prudhomme v. Mervine Kahn Co. 487 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
As to the general damages award, an appellate court may raise or lower such an award only after an articulated analysis of the particular facts of the case discloses an abuse of discretion by the trial court
Thompkins v. Sewell Plastics, Inc. 487 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Gagnet v. Zummo 487 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc., (La.App.
Segui v. Anthony 487 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Thompson v. City of New Orleans 487 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Perniciaro v. Brinch, supra; Reck v. Stevens
Hefner v. BJ McAdams, Inc. 487 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986