Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

Jones v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. 478 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Finley v. Bass 478 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Franklin v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers 478 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
upon appellate review we may not disturb an award of general damages made at the trial court level without a finding of clear abuse of discretion and then only after abuse is shown through an articulated analysis and for articulated reasons.
Thomas v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 477 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
501 quoting Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
Baillio v. McCarty 477 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Davis v. Allstate Insurance Co. 476 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
[ ] In other words, the fact that a person’s reaction to injury resulting from an automobile collision was more severe than that of most people, did not lessen the responsibility of the person who caused the accident to compensate the injured person for all consequences of the accident.” The jury had the diffi
Whipp v. Bayou Plaquemine Brule Drainage Bd. 476 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Wooten v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 477 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Schexnayder v. State 477 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Daigle v. Hanson 476 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Tyler v. Richardson 476 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Thissel v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 476 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Klein v. Himbert 474 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Perniciaro v. Brinch, supra
Murphy v. State 475 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Arteck Services, Inc. v. Crown Point Industries, Inc. 473 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Tischler v. City of Alexandria 471 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Hebert v. Domingue 473 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Williams v. Reinhart (La.App.
Harrington v. City of Abbeville 471 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
in the words of the court: "[T]he initial inquiry must always be directed at whether the trier court's award for the particular injuries and their effects upon this particular injured person is, a clear abuse of the trier of fact's `much discretion' ...
Carson v. Witty 471 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Abrams v. Dinh 471 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Gilder v. Branton 471 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
*980 (La.1979); (La.App.
Burge v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Health & Human Resources 469 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Without a clear articulation of manifest error, we must not disturb the trial court’s findings or damage awards.
Robertson v. Penn 472 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Since we cannot say that evidence points so overwhelmingly to abuse of jury discretion [ ], or its application of incorrect legal standards as to quantum, reasonable men could differ as to the amount to award Larry for his injuries.
Moity v. Castille 469 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
quoting from Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., : "[b]efore a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
Champagne v. Lee 470 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Nelson v. Evans 470 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Daniels v. Allstate Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra ; Winterrowd, supra; (La.App.
Clarke v. Progressive American Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Turner v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America 472 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Arcemont v. Voisin 468 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Leonard v. Blackburn 468 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Mendez v. American Fire & Indemnity Co. 468 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Rose v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Vincent v. Allstate Insurance Co. 468 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Freeman v. Harold Dickey Transport, Inc. 467 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Barras v. Touchet 467 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Bordelon v. Southern La. Health Care Corp. 467 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Richardson v. Continental Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
as follows: "Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual circumstances of the present case.
Cariere v. State Farm Ins. Co. 467 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Smith v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co., Inc. 467 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Hatcher v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Development 467 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Taylor v. CHARITY HOSP. OF LOUISIANA 466 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Dunn v. Zetz Seven-Up Bottling Co. 466 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Capone v. King 467 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Once such a determination of abuse of discretion has been made, the court may then resort to prior awards in comparable cases for guidance in fixing the appropriate award in the case before it
Guillory v. Agee 465 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1982), wherein we held: “ ‘ as follows: “Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to' the individual circumstances of the present case.
Tate v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1982), wherein we held: "` as follows: "Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual circumstances of the present case.
Sullivan v. Quick 465 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Gearen v. Insured Lloyds Ins.
Jordan v. Sweeney 467 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hernandez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets 464 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Alexander v. City of New Orleans 464 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
The amount awarded is somewhat on the low end