Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Morvant v. Smith 463 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc.
Grappe v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 462 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Free v. Franklin Guest Home, Inc. 463 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
: In the initial determination of excessiveness or insufficiency, an examination of prior awards has a limited functionif indeed the facts and circumstances of the prior awards are closely similar to the present.
Jacks v. Allstate Ins. Co. 463 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
: Thus, the initial inquiry must always be directed at whether the trier [sic] court's award for the particular injuries and their effects upon this particular injured person is, a clear abuse of the trier of fact's "much discretion", La.
Perrette v. City of Slidell 465 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
Dumas v. Jetson 462 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Leitz v. Wentzell 461 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The well established rule is that an award for damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless an appellate court can give articulable reasons why on the particular facts of the case before it the award is an abuse of the trier of fact's "much discretion", (La.
Wright v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. 461 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
The personal injury damage cases routinely seen by this court use the "clear abuse of discretion"
Horton v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 461 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Hughes v. Querbes & Nelson, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Norris v. Pool Well Service, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra ; Winterrowd, supra; (La.App.
Cutchall v. Great American Pump Co. 460 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra ; Winterrowd, supra; (La.App.
Efferson v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 463 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Berthelot v. Imes 459 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Bickham v. Goings 460 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hayes v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 459 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Watson v. Ben 459 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
(1979), the Supreme Court discussed the guidelines for an appellate court's review of a trial court's damage award.
Jackson v. Evans Cooperage Co. 459 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Followed Oliva v. Cafe Maspero, Inc. 459 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Art. 1934(3), and given to the trier of fact in assessing damages
Gallardo v. New Orleans Steamboat Co. 459 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Allen v. Wagner-Truax Co. 459 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Evans v. Newton 459 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
O'Quinn v. Haas Inv. Co., Inc. 458 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Fuselier v. La. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. 458 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1979)]; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ..."
Savoie v. Judice 458 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. Smith 459 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Sepulvado v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, Inc. 459 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
: Thus, the initial inquiry must always be directed at whether the trier [sic] court's award for the particular injuries and their effects upon this particular injured person is, a clear abuse of the trier of fact's "much discretion", La.Civ.C.
Towns v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. 459 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc. 458 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Louisiana Constitution Article 5 § 10(B); Louisiana Civil Code article 1934(3); -501 (La.1979); (La.
Humphrey v. Gauthreaux 458 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Leleux v. Home Indem. Co. 457 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Moore v. Brumfield 459 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Winterrowd v. Travelers Indem. Co. 452 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra ; (La.App.
Solomon v. Skinner 458 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Price v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. 457 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Morgan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 456 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, supra ; Alexander v. Leger, 423 * (La.App.
Bloodworth v. Carroll 455 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Andrews v. LA. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., LTD. 454 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Heymann v. Allstate Insurance Co. 454 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Once such a determination of abuse has been made, the court may then resort to prior awards in comparable cases for guidance in fixing the appropriate award in the case before it
Lorio v. San Antonio Inn 454 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The well established rule is that an award for damages will not be disturbed on appeal unless an appellate court can give articulable reasons why on the particular facts of the case before it the award is an abuse of the trier of fact's "much discretion"
Martin v. Gulf South Beverages, Inc. 454 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Darbonne v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America 452 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
art. 1934(3); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Hoff v. Canal Refining Co. 454 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Ponder v. Groendyke Transport, Inc. 454 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Bender v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarket, Inc. 452 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Starks v. Silton 453 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coffil v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 453 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
we have concluded that the award constitutes an abuse of discretion.
Dobard v. Skate Country, Inc. 451 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Howery v. Linton 452 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984