Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498.

1552 citing documents.

Blanchard v. 12055 Airline Corp. 432 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Sciortino v. Alfano 435 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
See Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Nolan v. Ochello 433 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Duvernay v. ST. THROUGH DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 433 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Taylor v. Meyer 432 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Even though the awards appear minimal, they are the lowest we could award on a
Oshinski v. Central Nat. Ins. Co. of Omaha 432 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
While both sides have argued persuasively that this judgment should have been higher or lower, we are unable to conclude that there was a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court such as to warrant a
Taylor v. State 431 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Lloyd v. Hunt Exploration, Inc. 430 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Johnson v. Carter 430 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Strickland v. Tesoro Drilling Co. 434 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Young v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 430 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Rennier v. State, Through Dept. of Pub. Saf. 428 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Cullivan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 428 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Samanie v. Bourg 434 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Prevost v. Cowan 431 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Brown v. McDonald's Corp. 428 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. 425 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Forstall v. Hotel Dieu Hosp. 429 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Jackson v. Tate 428 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
DiBenedetto v. Stark 428 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Dunaway v. Rester Refrigeration Service, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The proper method for analyzing the propriety of a as follows: "Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual circumstances of the present case.
Harris v. Atlanta Stove Works, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Distinguished Burglass v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co. 427 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Carroll v. State Farm Ins. Co. 427 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Daigle v. Bias 427 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
and the cases cited therein.
Crow v. Goins 427 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Gibson v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 426 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
App. 3rd Cir.) wherein we held: " as follows: `Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual circumstances of the present case.
Slaughter v. Royal Globe Insurance 426 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Geraci v. Southern Scrap Material Co. 425 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Ritter v. Willis 425 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Taranto v. Cook 425 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
O'BRIEN v. Delta Gas, Inc. 426 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Lofton v. Whimper 425 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Marshall v. Commercial Union Ins.
Cupit v. Grant 425 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
McCarroll v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 427 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standards to be followed by appellate courts in reviewing general damage awards.
Circello v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 425 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Villavaso v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 424 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Rye v. Terminix Service Co., Inc. 423 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Higdon v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., supra; See also: (La.
Cabone v. Melba Ice Cream Co. 423 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Alexander v. Leger 423 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra.
Lott v. Burton 423 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In addition, the decision of the trial court as to quantum should not be disturbed on appeal unless there is an abuse of its “much discretion.”
Liner v. City of Houma 423 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standard to be followed by appellate courts in reviewing trial court damage awards.
Murphy v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Payne v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Everett v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Thornhill v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Abshire v. Dubois 422 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
and the cases cited therein.
Coleman v. Douglas Public Service, Inc. 423 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Perniciaro v. Brinch, supra
Sanders v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 422 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
BONNET, ETC. v. Slaughter 422 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982