Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haynes v. Mangham, 375 So. 2d 103.

28 citing documents.

In Re: J.D.P. and A.N.P., Applying for Intrafamily Adoption La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“Whether the support provided is ‘significant’ depends on the particular facts and circumstances of the case under consideration.” Tutorship of Shea, 619 So.2d at 1241
In Re: J. W. R., D. C. R., and D. J. R. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Elio Motors, Inc. v. La. Motor Vehicle Comm'n 268 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
290 , 121 L.Ed.2d 215 (1992) (criminal statute) and Haynes v. Mangham , , 105 (La.
In Re: Adoption of E.F.F. by J.L.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
9:422.1, took a “common sense” interpretation of the statute in stating: “If a parent under court order to support a child has not made a significant support payment within a year prior to filing of the petition for adoption, that parent loses the right to prevent the adoption by withholding c
In re Adoption of E.F.F. ex rel. J.L.B. 85 So. 3d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
9:422.1, took a “common sense” interpretation of the statute in stating: “If a parent under court order to support a child has not made a significant support payment within a year pri- or to filing of the petition for adoption, that parent loses the right to prevent the adoption by withholding consent.” (Emphasis add
In re Washburn 819 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Myers v. Myrick 787 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
and Anderson v. Ramer, 27,469 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/95), .
German v. Galley 712 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
9:422.1, took a “common sense” interpretation of the statute in stating: “ If a parent under court order to support a child has not made a significant support payment within a year prior to filing of the petition for adoption, that parent loses the right to prevent the adoption by withholding consent.” (Emphasis adde
Anderson v. Ramer 661 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
the supreme court applied a common sense interpretation to LSA-R.S.
Tutorship of Shea 619 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Emw, Jr. v. Jpm 583 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
EMW v. JPM 583 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
We would note, however, that under the expanded pleadings, the level of support that would block the application of 9:422.1 A(2) must be “significant.” (La.
Tripp v. Jurls 559 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
In Re Lambert 545 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Kirby v. ALBERT TJ 517 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
In re Kuchler 513 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In Re MML 469 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
that a significant contribution of support in the year prior to the adoption proceeding may satisfy the support requirement of LSA-R.S.
State ex rel. Shroeder 470 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In re M.M.L. 469 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
The juvenile court indicated its awareness of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s that a significant contribution of support in the year prior to the adoption proceeding may satisfy the support requirement of LSA-R.S.
In Re MAY 441 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Ross v. Miles 430 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Blackburn v. Barrios 427 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Under the Supreme Court’s (La.
In Re Glass Applying for Adoption 424 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
3d Cir.1980); In re Hinton, supra ; Adoption of Latiolais, supra ; Adoption of Jarreau, (La.App.
In Re Ragas 393 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Cf. In re Haynes v. Mangham, [ ], supra.
In re Whitten 391 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1034 , (1966); Adoption of Edwards, (La.App.
In re Brunet 393 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Adoption of Latiolais 376 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
handed down September 4, 1979.
DeRosier v. Dean 378 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979