DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Holden, 375 So. 2d 1372.

70 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. George Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    This case therefore also implicates the Court’s which involved a defendant’s collateral attack on a 1972 federal conviction by way of a guilty plea then used to enhance his sentence under La.R.S.
  • State v. Morgan 134 So. 3d 1160 La. 2014
    Id., 09-0735 at 13, 11 So.3d at 482 ; (for non-Louisiana pleas used to enhance sentence, the defendant “has the affirmative burden of showing that he was in fact not advised, either by the court or through counsel, of the particular circumstances of his plea that were not touched upon in an otherwise sufficient colloquy.”) (emphasis added)
  • State v. Lyons 134 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    art. 771 condemns the use of remarks that are “irrelevant or immaterial and of such a nature that it might create prejudice against the defendant or the state, in the mind of the jury.” overruled in part on other grounds, (citing La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    |7In other cases, we have found a minute entry alone to be sufficient under [State v.] Lewis [ ] and [State v.] Holden [ ].
  • State v. Balsano 11 So. 3d 475 La. 2009
    This case therefore also implicates the Court’s which involved a defendant’s collateral attack on a 1972 federal conviction by way of a guilty plea then used to enhance his sentence under La.
  • State v. Watson 911 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    See, (all three cases requiring the defendant to affirmatively show substantial defects in out-of-state predicate convictions).
  • State v. Johnson 833 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    [4] Overruled in part on other grounds
  • State v. Pierce 799 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    See, (all three cases requiring the defendant to affirmatively show substantial defects in out-of-state predicate convictions).
  • State v. Allen 777 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    1979) the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when the State used a plea from another state or a federal plea as a prior conviction in order to enhance a defendant's sentence under the Multiple Offender Statute, that State had to prove the conviction and its date by a certified copy of a minute entry (or an equival
  • State v. Coleman 762 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See, (all three cases requiring the defendant to affirmatively show substantial defects in out-of-state predicate convictions).
  • State v. Johnson 713 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Stewart 712 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Stewart 656 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    See, (all three cases requiring the defendant to affirmatively show substantial defects in out-of-state predicate convictions).
  • State v. Windham 630 So. 2d 688 La. 1993
  • State v. Shelton 621 So. 2d 769 La. 1993
  • State v. Roquemore 574 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lard 568 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    157 , 66 L.Ed.2d 72 (1980), rev'd on other grounds
  • State v. Beard 547 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Fleury 545 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hannah 530 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Because this third prior conviction resulting from a guilty plea occurred in Texas, applies: “In Holden we held that, when the state intends to use a plea of guilty as a prior conviction in order to enhance punishment under La.R.S.
  • State v. Jones 516 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Salter 515 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.) writ denied, n. 2 (La.1979), overruled in part on other grounds
  • State v. Martin 509 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    [2] Overruled in part on other grounds
  • State v. Wright 509 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Glenn 493 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Junegain 478 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smith 477 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lawson 474 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Baker 471 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Rome 469 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Blunt 464 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    The Louisiana supreme court has held, that a guilty-plea, rights-waiver form executed by defendant, although complete in every detail, is insufficient without minutes or transcript of a colloquy between judge and defendant showing the knowing and voluntary waiver required by Boykin v. Al
  • State Ex Rel. Martin v. State 462 So. 2d 637 La. 1985
  • State v. Gray 461 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    (partially overruled on other grounds, ), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that: “In a multiple offender hearing, only those previous pleas of guilty may be used to enhance a sentence which are supported by a contemporaneous record of a Boykin examination demonstrating the free and voluntary nature of a plea of guilty with an articulated waiver
  • State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. McKethan 459 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Britton 450 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Stewart 452 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    that when using a non-Louisiana guilty plea in an enhancement proceeding, the state is required to prove only that the defendant pled guilty with representation of counsel.
  • State v. Sisk 444 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Cressy 440 So. 2d 141 La. 1983
    however, this court held that a different standard applied to convictions occurring prior to December 9, 1971, as well as to those occurring in federal and non-Louisiana courts: "However, Lewis is overruled insofar as it announced a similar rule for Louisiana state convictions prior to December 8, 197
  • State v. Murray 436 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Martin 427 So. 2d 1182 La. 1983
    this court held that a defendant could not complain for the first time on appeal that the record did not reflect compliance with the "three-right articulation rule" at the guilty plea on the prior felony.
  • State v. Bland 419 So. 2d 1227 La. 1982
    in discussing whether Lewis applied to non-Louisiana convictions, noted that the "contemporaneous record" of Lewis meant either the minutes or a transcript: "
  • State v. Santiago 416 So. 2d 524 La. 1982
  • State v. Berndt 416 So. 2d 56 La. 1982
    the state is only required to prove, in guilty pleas entered before December 8, 1971 that defendant pleaded with representation by counsel.
  • State v. Talbert 416 So. 2d 68 La. 1982
  • State v. Yarbrough 418 So. 2d 503 La. 1982
    2085 , 60 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979), re-evaluated its position in the Lewis case, supra, and upheld the use of a federal conviction in a multiple offender proceeding even though the state did not affirmatively establish compliance with this court's three rights articulated waiver rule.
  • State v. Age 417 So. 2d 1183 La. 1982
  • State v. Smith 415 So. 2d 930 La. 1982
  • State v. Smith 408 So. 2d 1110 La. 1981
  • State v. McGinnis 413 So. 2d 1307 La. 1981